In a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and section 151 CPC, the High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous upon counsel's informed submission, without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3304 ]
i I I I i I I I I i
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAO (Special Originat Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 232 10 0F 2018
Between:
M.Shoba, wo.Late M.survanarayana, Age 56 yrs, Rl/o.Frat No.202, rndira Encrave, Ashok Nagar, Hyderabad.'
.....PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Articre 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, tne nigh'co:u.t ,rv o" pleased too issue a writ or orders or Direction more partiiurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, decraring the action of'the Rei[onaenis not considering the options given by the petitioner and transferred to a pra;; ;;ich is other-than the option as iilegar, arbiirary and unconstitutionar and set asioe tne transfer order No. EcllABl2olS-191521 dated 18.06.2018 issueo oy tte ero respondent.
l.A.NO:1 OF 2018
Petition Under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed,in support of the petition, tne uign court may ou p6r.uo to suspend the transfer order. No. EcrtABr2oll-lglszl dated ia.oo.zoitsro respondent by retaining the petitioner in the same place.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Dr.J.Vijaya Lakshmi
Counsel for the Respondents : Gp For Roads and Buildings
The Court made the following Order ; .
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHSIAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO.2321O OF 18
ORDER:
Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, both
the counsels inlormed this Court that the subject matterof
the writ petition has become infructuous.
dismissed as inliuctuous.No costs.
Pending tniscellaneous applications, ifany, shall
stand closed
sD/'N. .HANDRA'EKHARRAo ASSIST4NTREGISTRAR
//TRUE coPY//
se(#o^r oFFlcER
To
SA GJP
.ux--
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:1010812A23
ORDER
WP.No.23210 of 2018
1, ts_ r_a,{..
A:
,, t'*il
.-'r1r
(, -
..:)'
1, : tl
t{
,'1 ',/
:l
DISMISSING THE WP
AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
M.Shoba
the state of telangana
NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
