Challa Balaji v. The State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32961
<br>
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKARREDDY
WRIT PETITION NO:22974 OF 2023
Between:
Challa Balaji, S/o. Late Yanadaiah, Aged lYears,Occ Contractor,Rl/o.D No. 271211760-1, Ramji Nagar, 4th Street, BalajiNagarNellore
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of theConstitution of lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiledtherewith, the High Courtmay be pleased to issue a writ, order or direclion moreparticularly one in the natureof writ of Mandamus, declaring theinaction on the part of the respondents2 and 3 in releasing the amounts for thepart of works done by the petitionerie., (1) Widening and Strengthening of existingsingle laneto double lane roadof NH 7 to ltikyaia Road fromOtO. lo7lO conneting Mandal Headquarters to District Headquarters , (2) Widening and Strengtheningof existingsingle lane to double lane road of Dharoor Old Road forKm o/o. to 7/0 connectingMandal Headquarters to District HeadquartersMahaboob Nagar District and (3) Widening and Strenghtening of leejarajapurRoadfrom Km OlO.To 14lO( working reach km 0/0 to 7/0 and Km 8t7 lo14lO in Mahaboob Nagar District and directing the 4th respondent to remit Rs.49,69,1001 for encashment of the Bank Guarantees as mentioned in theletter dt.11.o8.2O23, without releasing bill amounts in favour ofpetitioner is illegalarbitraryand violativeof principles of naturaljustice and consequently directthe respondentsto releasethe bill amounts for thepart of works doneby the petitioner as stated aboveas per the
agreement dl. 22.9.2016 and 15.2.2016 so as to enable the petitioner to do balance works in the interest of justice.
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 not to encash the bank guarantees liy ao ruo. 1O78G160172 for a sum of Ps.'18,18,100/- (2) BG No. 1078G160i7d ior a sum of Rs. 3,24,300/- and (3) BG No. 10783170206 for a sum of Rs.28,26,700/_ submitted by the petitioner pending disposal of the above wp in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRt T. JANARDHAN RAO
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3: Gp FOR ROADS & BU|LDINGS
Counsel forthe Respondent No.4: - - - -
The Court made the following: ORDER
i
----7
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION N0.22974 0F 2023
ORDER:
karned counsel for the petitioner filed a letter, dated 29.11.2023 in the Registry seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition.
withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs
Miscellaneous petitions, if arry, pending in this writ
petition shall stand closed.
SD/. K.SREERAMA MURTHY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTI R
To, 1. One CC to SRI T. JANARDHAN RAO,Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR ROADS & BUILDINGS,HighCourt for the State of Telangana. [OUT]
BN GJP
B
/
HIGH COURT
DATED:0411212023
ORDER
WP.No.22974 of 2023
1t\ EST4r€
q
a
cof
[ 5 JAN 2024
* '<
*
D6s pA"f C'i 6O
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WTHOUT COSTS
Ai,,iu %ffi
Challa Balaji
The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Roads and Buildings Department
The Superintendent Engineer (R & B), Circle, Mahaboob Nagar, Telangana State
The District (R & B) officer, (Executive Engineer), Jogulamba Gadwat, Telangana State
The Branch Manager, Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd
C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
K. Sreerama Murthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court