The petitioner challenged a deduction of HRA and penalty from his salary, seeking a writ of Mandamus to declare the deduction illegal. The High Court observed that the cause did not survive for adjudication and dismissed the writ petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 22719 OF 2017
Between:
K. Gnaneshwar, S/o. K. Ram Chander, Ag ed about 32 years, Occ Conductor, E.219150, Rl/o. Nediwar (V), Kandukur (tvl) ,Mahboob Nagar District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RES'.NDENT.
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of lr/andamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in deducting HRA (House Rent Allowances) and penalty amount of Rs.6800/-from the petitioners salary without handing over thequarter as illegal arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the respondents to not to deduct Rs.6800lfrom the petitioners salary and to pay the deducted amount to the petitioner l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO :2798O oF 2017\
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to stay the recovery of HRA (House Rent Allowances) andpenalty amount of Rs.68001 from the petitioner's salary, pending disposal of writpetition
Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. ISHRATH BEGUM REP SRI G. RAVI MOHAN
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI THOOM SRINIVAS(SC FOR TSRTC) The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BI,E SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVASi I1AO
Writ Petitiot No. 22719 of'.ZOl7
ORDER:
When t he matter was taken up fo. corrsjde riltion, Ms Ishrath Br:gum, learned counsel representing S;rir-i.Ravi Mohan, learr: ed counsel for the petitione:' fairly sr.rbmits that the caui;e in the Writ Petition does not sr.Lrvive for adj udication.
Per-rdinl; miscellaneous petitions, if antr,..hal1
stand closed
\
S])/- G. SIREESHA r\SSlSTl\Nl'REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// .: lt I;ECTION OFFICER
To, 1. one CC toSRI G. RAVI MoHAN,A{v9c-ale-tQf!J)1- ^ -.. ^' i. il; dc i"sni. rHootusntrutvAs (sc FoRTSRI'c)[cPUC] 3. Two CDCoPies BM GJP
0
HIGH COURT
DATED:2710912023
ORDER
1fr;;
t:.i 77
(,)^,Y t
N)"
Fra!
Ni
.o
l.
(
)J r. y_2
{S=
WP.No.22719 o12017
DISMISSING HE WRIT PETITION AS INFRIJCTOUS WITHOUT CC STS
fr(* 9e.f'r*
2 provisions across 2 enactments
K. Gnaneshwar
Regional Manager, Hyderabad Region, TS RCT
Depot Manager, TS RTC, Musheerabad Bus Depot
J Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
