The High Court at Hyderabad, Telangana, dismissed a writ petition filed by a student challenging the delay in disbursing tuition and maintenance fees as infructuous, noting no cause survived for adjudication.
Dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous; miscellaneous applications pending, if any, closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 2'1702 OF 2013
Between:
M.Gopal, S/o. M.Kishan, Occ: Student, Age: 19 Yrs, R/o. Wadlam (PO), Bitch Konda Mandal, Nizambad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to lssue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not taking immediate steps to the disbursal of tuition fee (RTF) shall be made in two installments to the college concerned and the disbursal of maintenance charges (MTF) shall be made in four installments to the students bank accounts before 31st March of every year which may be resulted in frustration / deprivation of "Life and Liberty" of the petitioner, guaranteed under article 21 of the constitution of lndia are arbitrary, illegal, violative of constitutional rights.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP. NO: 26s74 OF 2013't
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents to disburse of pending tuition fee (RTF) and maintenance charges (MTF) for the academic year 2012-13 before 31 st July, 20'13 in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI C.SRI HARI PRASAD FOR SRI D.V.RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.f : GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: GP FOR FINANCE & PLANNING Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following: ORDER
I{ON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENTVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION No.o.1 7O2 of 2013
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri C. Sri Hari Prasad, learned counsel representing Sri Dr. D.V. Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
ln view of the above submission, the writ petition IS
dismissed as infructur.rus.
Miscellaneous applications, pcnding if any, shall stand closed.
\
To
SD/.N. SRIHARI ASSTSTANT REGt9TRAR //TRUE COPY// ;;;;#;,; r
PSK.
crPA_,_
HIGH COURT
DATED:21 10212023
ORDER
WP.No.21702 of 2013
H 14
e
o
I
oo 2 4 t'lAR 208
* o,ts D,1 I
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
(to)
N<br>]\ v)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging non-disbursal of tuition and maintenance fees survives for adjudication.
M. Gopal
State of Andhra Pradesh Through its Prl. Secretary, Social Welfare Department
State of Andhra Pradesh Through its Prl. Secretary, Finance Department
State of Andhra Pradesh Through its Prl. Secretary, Higher Education Department
J. Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
