Dismissed

Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited, v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC17 Oct 2023WP/20121/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

On 17.10.2023, Dr. Justice Chillakur Sumalatha disposed of Writ Petition No.20121 of 2023 filed by Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited seeking a writ of Mandamus to direct respondents to register an Assignment Agreement. The court granted permission to withdraw the petition and dismissed it as withdrawn without costs.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition accorded. The writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications stand closed.

Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^320e ]

¶2

]N THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO:20121 OF 2023

¶7

Between:

¶8

Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited,^(Acting in its capacity as Trustee of the EARC Trust- SC 453) Having its registered office at Edelweiss House, Off C.S.T. Road, Kalina, Mumbai -400098 and represented by^its authorized signatory Ms. Vaishnavi Macherla

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

ANO

¶11

The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue, Registration and Stamps Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶12

The Sub-Registrar, The Office of the District Registrar of Assurance, 11-4653/4, Red Hill Road, Burhanuddin Community, Red Hills, Lakdikapul, Hyderabad

¶13

...RESPONDENTS

¶14

Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High^{Courtmay be} pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent to regisler the Assignment Agreement daled 0510412023 entered into between CFM ARC and^{the Petitioner.}

¶15

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶16

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may^{be pleasedto} direct the Respondent to^{provisionally} register the Assignment^{Agreementdated} 0510412023 as any document under the^provisions of Registration^{Act will have to} registered within a^period of 4 months from the date of execution.

¶17

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V. ANEESH

¶18

Counsel for the Respondents: ASST. GP FOR STAMPS^{AND REGISTRATION}

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

HONBLE DT, JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶21

WRIT PETITION No.2O121 OF 2023

¶22

ORDER;

¶23

This Writ Petition is frled seeking the Court to issue arr order in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to register the Assignment Agreement dated 05.4.2023 entered into between CFM ARC and the petitioner. 2. Sri V.Aneesh, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks

¶24

permission to withdraw the Writ Petition.

¶25

Permission, as prayed for, is accorded

¶26

The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as

¶27

to costs.

¶28

As a sequel, pending miscelianeous applications, if any,

¶29

shall stand ciosed

¶30

//TRUE COPY//

¶31

SD/. K.SREERAMA^MURTHY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR seffiu oFFtcER

¶32

To, 1. One CC to SRI V. ANEESH, Advocate [OPUC] i. il; cc.'lJci^{Fon Srnvps AND REGlsrRArloN, High court forthe} State of Telangana. [OUT] 3. Two CD CoPies

BN GJP

P&tc..

HIGH COURT

DATED:1711012023

ORDER

WP.No.20121 ot 2023

y\i. s-i- Ar€
+'
1i
I !-- ,. ll ir- :r., Ir!! i o:a
7
'.-.
''<--,:-:...r - '..'

¶40

DISMISS!NG THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

¶41

@r r'\Ci
6 \ <br>

Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ch.Bala Krishna Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

K.L.Rao @ Kondal Rao Hari Vs State of Telangana

Bandlamudi Malyadri Vs The State of Telangana

B. Rama Swamy S/o. Kishtaiah Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its

Smt. Shahana Begum Vs State of Telangana

Mirza Abdul Mannan Baig Vs The State of Telangana