Dismissed

Dr.S.K.Mahmood,Usmania University, Hyderabad v. Osmania University, Rep.by Its Registrar, Hyderabad

Telangana HC3 Apr 2023WP/2001/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge disposed of Writ Petition No. 2001 of 2001 and connected miscellaneous petitions against Osmania University. The court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous after the petitioner was already promoted to Professor in January 2017, extinguishing the cause of action regarding retention of Senior Scale.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner's writ petition dismissed as infructuous due to his subsequent promotion to the post of Professor.

Dr.S.K.Mahmood,Usmania University… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE.OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAO[ 3167 ] (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

IVIONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY

¶5

Between:

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 2001 oF 2011

¶7

Dr. S.K. Mahmood, S/o.Late S..K lr.4oinuddin, Occ: Associate professor Depot of tsotany, Osmania University. HyOeraUiO.-^'

¶8

AND

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

Osmania University, rep. by lts Registrar, Hyderabad

¶11

...RESPONDENT

¶12

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or drrection parti!.ularty one in the nature of writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondent in not extending the promotion as professor by giving effect ro rhe recomendations of the service matter committee award of UGc scares with effect from the date of his ,oining as Research Associate i.e.22.g.1gg9 and regurate subsequent promotrons with a, consequentiar and attendant benefits_

¶13

t.A. NO: 10F 2011(WPMP. NO:2447 OF 20111

¶14

Petition under Section i 51 CpC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petitron, the High court may be preased to direct the respondent to drspose of the petitioner request to rerease the promotion by accepting the recomendatrons of the Service matter committee with regard to awarding of the UGC scare with effect from the date of his joining as Research Associate i e 22 g.1g89 by pracing it before the next Executive councir meeting_

¶15

il2il

¶16

l.A. NO: 1 O^F 2015(WP^{/IP. NO:14174OF 20151}

¶17

Petition under Sr^{ction 151 CPC praying that in the Cirt;unts.an,;esstatedin} the affidavit filed^{in :;u1 port of the petition,the High court rray b'-' pieaseddirect} the Respondent to^{grar t promotion to the post of Professor 2lenr; ivith modification} of the date of^{promotiorr of Associateprofessorand senior s( al€ t() the petitioner'}

¶18

Counsel for the Petiti(^{ner: Dr. P.B. VIJAY KUMAR}

¶19

Counsel for the^{Respr'ndents: SRI K. NARENDRA,SC FOROIJ}

¶20

The Court made^{the fi,llowing:ORDER}

¶21

¶22

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY

¶23

WRIT PETITION No.2OOI of 2O11

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

The learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the petitioner has alread_y been promoted as Professor, and accordingly, placed on record the order dated 16.O1.2017, passed by the Registrar, Osmania University, Hyderabad.

¶26

Having regard to the above, the cause of action in the present writ petition does not survive and the present writ petition is, accordingll', dismissed as infructuous

¶27

Pending miscellaneous petitions, il any shall also stand

¶28

dismissed. There shall be no ordcr as to costs

¶29

SD/. T. JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY//

¶30

SECTION OFFICER

¶31

To, 1. One CC to Dr. P.B. Vijay Kumar, Advocate [OPUCI 2. One CC to Sri K. Narendra,^{SC FOR OU} [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRl. S LAKSHIVI^{KANTH, SC FOROU} [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies

CHR SB

?otu,

HIGH COURT

DATED:03104 2023

ORDER

W.P.No.2001 cf 2011

"fi;i;
I )t,
C- <br>-
.::
{
<br>.r)l .
ej!-

¶39

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTIJOUS WITHOUT CC,STS

¶40

G^QorC.., \6 ( '; '.:'

Dr.S.K.Mahmood,Usmania University, Hyderabad v. Osmania University, Rep.by Its Registrar, Hyderabad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr.S.K.Mahmood,Usmania University, Hyderabad v. Osmania University, Rep.by Its Registrar, Hyderabad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K. Nagarjuna Rao s/o K. Sriram Murthy, Vs Geetha Vignana Aided High School

Mohd Bin Salam Vs Sandeep Kumar Sultania and 2 Others

B. Lavanya Vs Bogoju Raja Siddartha Shanakaragiri

M. Shivanandam, S/o. Abbaiah, Vs The Chairman / Managing Director, Apsrtc

G. Dasthagir, Sharmic, E 301914 Vs The Depot Manager, Apsrtc

Gade Chakrapani Vs Mamidala Raju