Exceptional order dismissing a writ petition filed under Article 226 and Section 151 CPC as infructuous on counsel's submission that the cause no longer survives for adjudication. No costs awarded.
Petition dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE S [32e6 ] ;,j r*i,' :ie.t? :, ::;^" "^'^
M.NDAY'1X3,'l?X,L1.ilJT,?AIi,Ilnl*,.*
PRESENT
Between:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETlTroN NO:18 96EO F2023
yi"'x,[: rulV fi'"y A,,'?'hifi:* R o H No 5 _ v;,"#:t r,i,'fu ,? Hsffi:, 'ii
AND
.....PETITIONER
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Articre 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ or order more particurarry one in the nature of writ of mandamus decraring the action of the Respondent No.3 to 6 in interfering into the peaceful business of the petitioner which is running on the name and styre of
Mis.KankadurgaWinessituatedatH No 5 -112 inSy'No'127/3ofthe TattiannaramVillage' Abdullapurmet tr/landal'Ranga Reddy District' without issuingany notice and without following the due processof law and due to the influenceof the Respondent No.7 and trying to close the Petitioner shop is illegal andarbitrary and violation of Articles14' 15' 21and 300-Aof the Constitution of lndiaand also violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Y:::l']/":i" the respondentNo 3 to 6 not to interfere into the Petitioners peaceful runningof businessand not to close his shop ieM/s' KankadurgaWines situatedat H.No.5-1/2in Sy'No 127i3of the Tattiannaram Village' AbdullapurmetMandal' RangaReddY District'
l.A. NO:'lOF2023
Cprayingthat in the circumstances stated PetitionUnderSection 151 CP petition, theHighCourt may be pleasedto in theaffidavitfiled in support of the to interfereinto the Petitioner'speaceful directthe resPondent No 3 to 6 not se hisshop i.e. M/s' KankadurgaWines runningof business and not to clo of theTattiannaram Village, Abdullapurmet situatedat H.No.5-1/2in Sy'No'127i3 Mandal, RangaReddy District, pending disposalof the abovewrit petition'
Counsel forthe Petitioner: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR
Counsel for theRespondent Nos.1 to 4 : GP FOR PROHIBITIONAND EXCISE Counsel for theRespondent No.5 : GP FOR HOME
Counsel forthe RespondentNo.6 : SRI CH.JAGANNATHRAO
Counsel for the Respondent No.7 : --
The Court made the following ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASI{AR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.18968 of2023
ORDER:
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the relief sought in the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/.V.KAVITHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPYII
C---
SECTIdT{ OFFTCER
To
AND EXCrsE, Hish court rorthe state 2. it:i"i,!;d;fi E?S[[3X!PJIfSN r!fffr";l: Stio* HoME, Hish court ror the State or retangana at
4.3. 1eCQloS1 fqpotuBhaskar, Advocate tOpUCr 5. il: BB Bg,::h.Jasannathnuo, et,,iJatJi6puct
SA GJP $--
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 811212023
SIATE O6
la
TI I\N NL\ J, g
o * -,|
.l-' , ,/
t.:..:!-
I DF:sr 1'.<br>
ORDER
WP.No.18968 of 2023
DISMISSING THE W.P
AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/s. Kankadurga Wines
Government of Telangana
Justice C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
