The High Court of Telangana allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India without costs.
Permission granted for withdrawal of the writ petition. Petition dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
l32s2l
IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTHDAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLEMRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITIONNO:18896oF 2023
Between:
KasturiLakshmareddy,S/o. K Ummareddy, ....aged about 54 6;;:"Isil;liliij,-nv".ir. uiiso''su'n'ipiilvvilla"se' SultanabadMandal "years ' PeddapallYDistrict
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
PetitionunderArticle 226 of the Constitutionof lndia praying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavitfiled therewith' the High Court may be pleasedto issue an appropriateWrit' order or direction more particularly one in the natureof Writ of MANDAMUS declaringthe action of the 3r-respondentin issuingdemand notice dated 16/06/2023wherein and where under it is directed topay an amount of Rs'1'67 '226'21 paisa allegedly due from SmtLate RateswariW/o'K'Lakshmareddyi'e' ' the petitionerswife' videLoanaccount andarso violative of articles14 and 300-A No.79012s6640t6as ittegat, "ro,,rrry of Constitutionof lndia and consequently set aside the same'
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in pursuance of the impugned demand notice dated 16lOGl2O23 issued by the 3rd respondent, pending disposal of the Writ Petition in this Honourable Court.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAVI KUMAR VADLAKONDA
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: cP FOR WOMEN DEVELOPMENT & CHILD WELFARE
Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel forthe Respondent No.3: SRI S. MUJEEB KUMAR
Counsel forthe Respondent No.4 & 5: - - - -
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPAILI NANDA P T F
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner brings on record, the letter dated D.OB.2O23 addressed to the Registrar (Judicial), High Court of Judicature, at Hyderabad. A bare perusal of the said letter indicates that the petitione r is not interested to prosecute the case further and seeks permission of the Court for withdrawal of the present writ petition.
permission is accorded.
Taking into consideration the contents of the letter dated 17.0g.2023, and on request of learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, iF any, pending in this writ Petition, shall stand clo se
SD/. P. CH. NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTAN-LREGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// Cb
SECTION OFFICER
To,
BN GJ
HIGHCOURT
DATED:18t0812023
ORDER
WP.No.18896of 2023
....-
:-.,.';,'::,|!.,,-
:
[ ] 'rlir! 2[B
DISMISSINGTHE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUTCOSTS
G)cop",<s
nA lv\qlr)
Kasturi Lakshmareddy
Department of Women and Child Welfare, Government of Telangana
District Collector, Peddapally District
Telangana Grameena Bank
Village Organizing Assistant Head of Swashakti Mahila Podupu Sangham
Raieswari
SUREPALLI NANDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
