The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the termination of the petitioner's service as Assistant Professor. The court accepted the respondent's submission that the case did not survive for adjudication.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous without costs. Miscellaneous petitions were closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3304 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 18619 OF 2013
Between:
P.Ramesh, S/o Sri P.Sathaiah, Aged 31 years, Occ: Assistant professor, Sreenidhi lnstitute of Science & Technology, R/o: H.No.8-24l1, Road No.1, Vidyut nagar New Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad.
AND
...PET|TIONER
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus: i) to declare the orders passed by the first respondent dated 16.04.2013 vide No. SNIST/ADMINfiCl2013 terminating services of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, unjust apart from violative of principles of natural justice and against the provisions of A.P. Education Act, 1982; and ii) to condequently set aside the same by directing the first respondent to take the petitioner back into service as Assistant Professor in Mathematics with retrospective effect i,e. from the date of termination by giving all service benefits including pay and allowances
I I l i I :I I
r.A. NO;2 0F 2013(WF MP. NO: 22748OF 2013)
Petition under S':ction 15'1 CPCprayingthat in th,: circtln stancesstated in the affidavit filed n su6port of thepetition,the High Courl may ct. plt:asedpending disposal of the writ pet lion, thepetitioners hereinpray that the Flon'lle High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugnr-'detmirtationorder No.SNIST/ADIr/lN/2tt1: dated 16.4.2013 by directing the'' rst and second respondents to take t repetitioner back into servicea sAssiisitan I Professor in Mathematics.
l.A. NO:1 O F 2014(Wt MP. NO: 3453 0F 2014)
Petition under S .;ction 151 CPCpraying that in th,: circtln-rstancesstated in the affidavit filed in s rpcort of thepetition,the High Oourt n;ry ce pleasedto receive the Addl. Affid rvitin Writ PetitionNo.18619 of :20'13 ,lnd treatas partof the counter affidavit fi :)c on behalf ofRR 1 and 2in the wri :retilionfor proper adjudication of the casr :tndpass.
l.A. NO:'l OF 2013(W\ M P. NO: 2425 OF 2013)
Between:
AND
Petition under Section151 CPC praying thatin the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support ofthe petition,the HighCourt may be pleasedto vacate the interim Orderpassed inWPMP No.2274812013in WP No. 18619/2013 dated 01.07.20'1 3 in the interest ofjustice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI NANDIGAM KRISHNA RAO Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: SRI M.PANDURANGA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI K.RATHANGA PANI REDDY, SC FOR JNTUH
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION
The Gourt made the following: ORDER
e
THE HON'BLI SiRT JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJES:IIWAR RAO
W.P.No.18619 of 2O13
ORDER:
Le:rrne( c ounsel appearing for the p,:titio-rr,,r s,ubmits thnt the caLr ,;t in the '"vrit petition does not s;ur,rive for adjudication
Rr:r:ordi r5, t he said submission, the r,r,ri1 ltetition is
dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
As a se.1rLel, the miscellaneous petitLons o,,,nding, if
anv, sha 11 sta rri <:losed.
-qD/-G. SIREESHA ASSI!iTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// '--lL) SI:CllON OFFICER
To
PSK GJP
61-
HIGH COURT
DATED:07l07lit0tz3
ORDER
WP.No.18619 rtl'2013
'rtE STAIE o
t'
: :'.t tl [ut t$B ::
)
.'.' t
\i. -l f\ c:l (rA {
-_=
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUCIUS WITHOUT COSTS.
B
.L9
2\
1P<br>e,"
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives for adjudication.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.Ramesh
Sreenidhi Institute of Science & Technology
The Principal, Sreenidhi Institute of Science & Technology
Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University
The Government of Andhra Pradesh
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
