High Court of Telangana dismissed a Writ Petition and Subject Civil Petition filed by an industrial unit seeking restoration of electricity supply, noting the petitioner's absence and lack of representation during hearings.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[321e ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Speciat Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI
WRIT PETITION No: 1779 0F 2022
Between:
Mis Azra Plastics lndustries, Eep by its prop. Syed Basheeruddin, S/o: Sved tMagbool ,uddin Aged 56 yrs, Oci: Brisiness Ryo H:No. lg_2:ZlliCisiiqil'ii. Basnarath nagar Kalapather, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Articte 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent no.2 in disconnecting the electricity supply to the petitioner's premises bearing Municipal No. 8- 1 4- 1911 (old) H.No.8-14-207/1 730/ 1 (new) situated at Miratam Tank, Rajendernagar, Rangareddy District without any reasons and without affording sufficient opportunity at the instance and behest of the respondent no.3 herein and without following due process of law as illegal arbitrary and violative of atlicle 14,21 of lndian constitution and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent no.2 to forthwith restore the electricity supply to the petitroner premises bearing Municipal No. 8-14-.t9/1 (old) H.No.8-
r ,-r:i:i-?: ^--'1
14-2071173011 (new) situated at Miralam Tank, Raje ndern a(,ar. Rangareddy District.
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the cir:rmstances stated in the affidavit filed in ;upport of the petition, the High court m ay :e pleased to direct the respondent no.2 to forthwith restore the electri :ity siupply to the petitioner premises be rring Municipal No. 8-14-1g/l (ol<1) H.trto g-14-20711730t1 (new) situated at Mir: lam Tank Ralendernagar, Ranqaredc v Dir;trict pending disposal of the writ pet tion.
Counsel for the Petitio ner: SRl. KHAJA AZHARUDDIN(NOT pRl:SE:NT)
Counsel for the Respo ndent No.1 and 2: SRl. R. VINOD REDtry SC FOR TSSPDCL
Counsel for the Respo ndent No.3: NONE AppEARED
The Court made the fo lowing: ORDER
I li
THE HON'BLE SMT. WSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION No.l779 of 2022
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is hled seeking a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.2 in disconnecting the electricity supply to the petitioner's premises bearing Municipal No.8-14-19/ I (old) H.No.8-14-207 llT30li (new) situated at Miralam Tank, Rajendernagar, Rangareddy District '*,ithout any reason and without affording sufficient opportunity at the instance and behest of the respondent No.3 herein and without lollowing due process of law as illegal and arbitrary and consequently to direct the respondent No.2 to forthwith restore the electricity supoly to the petitioner's premises and to pass such olher order or orders-
As there,lrras no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 1O.O4.2O23, the matter rvas directed to be listed under the caption ufor dismissa-l" on I 7 .O4 .2023. Inspite of the matter being listed under the caption "for dismissai", there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner even today. In view of the same, it is presumed that the petitioner is not interested to purslre the Writ Petition.
2
p vJ P No.1779 cf 202
Accordingly,tl re Writ Petitionis dismissed|br ll('n-prosecl,.tlon.
There shall beno r rcler as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions,ifan5', penciing irL this' Wr't Petition, shall stand closr:d
SD,'. K. AMMAJI ASSIS'I'ANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY/i
ser:rr,Jfi-oFFicin
To, 1 9n" QQ !o Sf.(raja Azharuddin,Advocare tOpUCI 2. One CC to Sri. R. Vinod Reddy, SC for TSSpDCL tObUCl 3. Two CD Copies
TJ SB ?nc,
I l
HIGH COURT
DATED:17tOtt2\23
,'I
1
ORDER
WP.No.17t9 r>f 2022
DISMISSING'-HE WP
FOR NON-PR )SECUTION
WITHOUT CO STS.
?['\c^, lelsl,r
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition filed under Article 226 and Section 151 CPC should be dismissed for non-prosecution?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mis Azra Plastics Industries, represented by Syed Basheeruddin
The Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited
The Divisional Electrical Engineer Operation TSSPDCL
Mohammed Younus
P. Madhavi Devi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
