Disposed

A Malathy (Ex Pgt) v. Secretary Ministry of Human Resources Development

Telangana HC25 Sept 2023WP/16290/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court disposed of this writ petition seeking direction to fix pension anomaly w.e.f. 01.01.2006, holding that the matter was already redressed via proceedings dated 28.01.2019 and a letter dated 02.09.2023 restricting the aggrieved party to further representation.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed with liberty to petitioner to make representation to respondents if she desires.

A Malathy (Ex Pgt) Vs Secretary Ministry… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³³⁰¹ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE^{STATEOF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

MONDAY, THE TWENTY^{FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER} TWO THOUSAND AND^{TWENTY THREE}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{PULLA KARTHIK}

¶6

WRIT PETI^{TION NO:16290OF 2014}

¶7

Between:

¶8

A.Malathy^(EX PGT),^{Wo R Krishna.swamy.Aged 61.ye€rs} 9".".'qd',r.g-{19 [NO r_7_Teglio, sRK l.iagar^{Risatagadda Golconoa X-Road Musheerabad P o} HYderabad 5oo o4B

¶9

...PETtrtoNER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 Secretarv Ministrv of Human Resources^{Development,NewDelhi- 1'10 001} Z. Seireiiri Ministri of^{Personnel Public Grievances&, Pensions Dep-artmentof} - Fension'and Pen'sioner's Welfare Lok Nayak Bhavan New Delhi 110 003

¶12

Commissioner^{(Finance), HQRS Kendirya vidayalaya Sa1ghil1tB'}

¶13

lnstitutional areb, Shaheed Jeet Singh Marg New Delhi 110 016

¶14

Finance Officer Kendirya^{Vidayalaya Sangathan,I 8, lnstitutionalarea,} Shaheed Jeet Singh Marg^{New Delhi 110 016}

¶15

S. Fininc"-Omcer,^{B-hopat {egion Kendirya Vidayalaya Sangathan Maidan Mills} Hoshangabad Road^{Bhopal462011M P lndia}

¶16

O. frrtanagei 1 lnstitutions),^{S B I Main Branch 4'n Floor Parliament Street New} Delhi^'1 10 001

¶17

chi;i vtrnag"r, s^{B I Central pension processingcentre MusheerabadMain} Road H,deraba

¶18

..RESP.NDENTS

¶19

Petition under Article²²⁶ of^{the constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the} circumstances stated^{in the affidavit filed therewith,the High court maybe} pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus^{and direct the respondents Nos 3 and 4 to} consider the representation^{of the petitioner dated 1-1-2013 to the respondent No} 3 for non clearing of anomaly^{in fixatation of petitionerpensionw e f '1-1-2006vide} reference No PPO No 111-1(272)^{pension / KVS/BPL/A/CS/04-05dt 21-12-2004} and also annexure - lll(^Revised )^{Part-Aof OM No 38/37l08-P&W(A)pt'1} dt 1-9-2008

¶20

l.A. NO: 1OF 2014^(WPMP. NO:^{20209 OF 20141}

¶21

Petition under section^{151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support of^{the petition,the High court maybe pleasedto direct} the respondent Nos. 3 &^{4 to follow the Annexure- lll (Revised) part A of ON/}

¶22

No.38/37108-P&W(A)^{pt-1 dated1-9-2008for peryment of the difference amount as} eligible to claim

¶23

Counsel for the Petitioner^{: SRI SANNIDHIRAJA MALLESWARARAO} Counsel forthe Respondent^{Nos.1& 2 : SRIGADI PRAVEEN KUMAR,} DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL^{OF INDIA}

¶24

Counsel for the Respondent^{Nos.3to 5 : SRI A'JAY KUMAR KULKARNI,SC} FOR KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA

¶25

Counsel for the^{Respondent Nos.6 & 7 : SR B.NARASIMHA SARMA'} STANDING COUNSEL

¶26

The Court made^{the following:ORDER}

¶27

¶28

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK}

¶29

WRIT PETITI oN No.16290^{OF 2014}

¶30

ORDER:

¶31

This Writ Petition is filed^{seeking a directionto the 3'd and 4d} respondents to consider the^{representation ofthe petitioner,dated} 0I.01.2013, for non-clearing^{of anomaly in hxation of pension of the} petitioner w.e.f., 0 1.0 1.2006.

¶32

When the matter is taken up^{for hearing, Sri Ajay Kumar Kulkarni,} learned Standing Counsel^{for Kendriya Vidyaiaya, appearing for respondent} Nos.3 to 5, produced^{acopy of the proceedingsNoF111-1(27 2l} Pension/KVS/BPL/A/Cs/3588-3591,^{dated 28.01.2019, and the letter,} d.ated o2.o9 .2o23, and^{submitsthat the pensionof the petitioner was} revised under 6m cPC in terms^{of oM Letter No.38/37I08-P&PW(A),dated} 01.09.2008, and her retiring^{pensionwas hxed at Rs'14,328/- (Rupees} Fourteen Thousand Three^{Hundredand Twenty Eight Only) Hence,the} grievance of the petitioner is^redressed.

¶33

Recording the above^{said submission,this wrii Petition is disposed of} with a liberty to the^{petitioner to make a representationto the respondents,} if she so desires.

¶34

Miscellaneous applications,^{if any, pending in this writ petition, shall} stand closed. No costs

¶35

SD/.P.CH.NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANIIIEGISTRAR //rRUE cOPY/t (4) SECNdN OFFICER

¶36

¶37

1 The Secretary^{Ministry of Human Resources Development' New Delhi-110} 001

¶38

2 iie Secretary^{Ministry of Personnel Public Grievances &, Pensions} o'."pr"rt".J,iilirrF.iniL'ninapensioners^{Wetfare Lok NayakBhavan New Delhi} 1 10 003

¶39

<-*L"

¶40

J The Commissioner ( Finance ), HORS Kendirya vidayalaya Sanghan 1 B,lnstitutional area, Shaheed Jeet Singh [Vlarg New Delhi 110 016

¶41

4 One CC to Sri Sannidhiraja l/alleswara Rao, Advocate [OPUC] t One CC to Sri Gadi Praveen Kumar, Deput'l Solicitor General of lndia [OPUC] o One CC to Sri B.Narasimha Sarma, Standirrg Counsel [OPUC] 7 One CC to Sri Ajay Kumar Kulkarni, SC for Kendriya Vidyalaya [OPUC] B Two CD Copies

¶42

¶43

'k SB

\ \

I t

HIGH COURT

DATED:2510912023

ORDER

WP.No.16290 of 2014

r S !ArB- o
{
l:, 25 ilij 2!?3
\ --'-
'i.q,-
1':\i: '
.:

¶51

DISPOSING OF THE WP^{WITHOUTCOSTS.}

¶52

%'**(rl

A Malathy (Ex Pgt) v. Secretary Ministry of Human Resources Development

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A Malathy (Ex Pgt) v. Secretary Ministry of Human Resources Development

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.S Narnyana, Vs Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport

Budha Raju Bharat Anand, Vs The Telangana State Power Generation

N. Srinivas, Vs A.P.S.R.T.C

T. Bal Reddy, Apsrtc., Nalgonda District. Vs Regl Manager, Apsrtc., Nalgonda District and Another

The Depot Manager, Apsrtc, Vs The Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court

G. Raja Lingaiah, Vs The Singareni Collieries Company Limited.