Writ petition filed by a Junior Assistant seeking mandatory promotion as Senior Assistant closed by the Hon'ble Court on grounds of a prior interim order pending, without further orders or costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3304 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
'
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 16183 OF 2018
Between:
Syed Ayesha Siddiqua, W/o (Late) lVlohd. Moinuddin, 40 years, Junior Assistant, O/o P & E Superintendent, Secunderabad.
...PET|T|ONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to grant appropriate relief more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus under Anicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia declaring the proceedings Cr..No. A2186712013, dt. 03.12.2016 issued by the 1st Respondent in so far as it relates to not promoting the Petitioner as Senior Assistant while keeping one post of Senior Assistant vacant as arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory malafide and unconstitutiona I violating Article'14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and issue consequential directions directing the Respondents to forthwith consider and promote the Petitioner as Senior Assistant in the vacancy which was kept vacant by proceedings Cr..No. 42186712013, dt. 03.12.2O16 issued by the 1 Respondent with effect from the date of promotion of party respondent ie., 18.11.2014 with all consequential benefits including arrears of salary and seniority etc.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K.SRINIVAS FOR SRI P.V.KRISHNAIAH Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 TO 4: GP FOR SERVTCES I Counsel for the Respondent No.5: ---
The Coud made the following: ORDER
I
TIIE HON'B],E] SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAP] RA.II],SHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO. 16183 OF 201[;
ORDER:
Today u,hen the matter is taker up lbr hearing, Sri K.Sr nivas, learned counsel representing Sri P.V.Krish raiah, Iearned counsel for the pt:titio rer informed this Court th;rt in view of thc intcrim order J asserl lrv t.his Court on 02.0.5.2013, no lurther orders are reqtiiled to be passed in
the Writ Petition
closed. No orc er as to costs
SD/-MoHl) SANAJLT-AHANSARI / ASSISI4\TREGISTRAR / /irRUE coPY// (.L?,,,* oFFlcER
To 1. One CC to SRI F .V.KRISHNAIAH' Advocate IOPUC] i. ;;; Ed"iJcpr;on sERViCLs-i,Higrr cou'rt ror tht: State or re lanqana' at Hyderabad. [OUT] J. Two CDCoPies PSK.
SB w
HIGH COURT
DATED:2910812023
{
ORDER
WP.No.16183 of 2018
I A
)'
x
lm
u g r$
;
... 4.
CLOSING THE UVRIT PETITION
WITHOUT COS TS.
Cc{al W-* 6-"t\D
Syed Ayesha Siddiqua
Deputy Commissioner, Prohibition and Excise
Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, State of Telangana
Prohibition and Excise Superintendent
State of Telangana
Smt. N. Niveditha
NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
