The Telangana High Court closed Writ Petition No.15755 of 2018 regarding promotion disputes and pending charge memos without passing further orders, as the matter was already subsumed by an interim order from 2018.
Petition closed; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3304 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OFTELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original J urisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OFAUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
T+{E HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICENAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 15755 OF 2018
Between:
B.Venkateswara Rao,S/o B.Ranga Rao,Hindu,Aged 50 Years, Occ- Presently working as Superintendent,0/o.District lVinoritiesWelfareOfficer, Khammdm. R/o.4-2-583, lndiranagarColony, Khammam, KhammamDistrict. PIN-s.'loo2
...PETtrtoNER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lheConstitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filed therewith,the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction moreparticularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the in-actionof the Respondentsin not considering the representation Dated.6.3.2O17 of thePetitioner, and not considering the caseof the Petitioner for Promotion to thepost of Tahsildar,on the ground that, a Charge memo Vide Rc.No.A1188412012 Daled-27.7.2012 and other Charge Memo Vide, Rc.No.A1/2047 t2012,Dated O3-11-2O15' is pending against me, and not concluding the enquiry afterlapse of ThreeYears, is illegal ,unjust,and violative of fundamental rightsenshrtnedby Articles14,16,and 21 of the Constitution of lndia, contraryto the Judgmentsof Hon'ble SupremeCourt, contrary to G.O.Ms.No.257,Dated 10-06-2009, andconsequentlyto direct the Respondents to consider thecase of the Petitioner for the Promotion to the post of Tahsrldar and consequently toquash aCharge memoVide Rc.No.A11884/2012 Dated.27.7.2012and chargelt4emo in Rc.No.A1l2O47l2O12, Dated 03-11 -201 5
lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition uncler Section 1 51 CPC prayrng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petitron, the Hrgh Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to Consider the case of the Petitioner for Promotion to the Post of Tahsildar as per G.O.[.4s.No. 257, Dated 10-06-2009, with out reference to the a Charge memo Vide Rc.No.Al1884/2012 Daled-27.7.2012 and other Charge lvlemo rn Rc.No.A1/204712012, Dated 03-11-2015, Pending disposal of this Writ Petrtron
Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt. KANAKA DHURGA REP
SRI. S.SYAMSUNDER RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
./...
I i
THE HON'BLE SRI IUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAIESHNTAR RAO
w.P.NO.15755 0F 2018
ORDER:
Today when the matter is taken up for hearing,
Smt. Kanaka Dhurga, learned counsel representing Sri
S.Syamsunder Rao, learned for the petitioner informed
this Court that in view of the interim order passed by
this Court on 30.04.2018, no further orders are required
to be passed in the Writ Petition
learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is
closed.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall
stand closed.
SD/. MOHD. SANAULLAH ANSARI ASSISTADII REGISTRAR //TRUE coPY/t (lO SECTTON OFFICER
To, 1. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] 2. One CC to SRl. S. SYAIVSUNDER RAO, Advocate tOpUCl 3. Two CD Copies BIV GJP fr\q.
HIGH COURT
DATED:2210812023
ORDER
WP.No.15755 of 2018
t'
.a
,/ _, llt<br>/' :(
ii:-r 2E SEP 2M
\1, >
\i .-
CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
m, 1t<sup>a\23,
B.Venkateswara Rao
The State of Telangana
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
