I sr-rbmit tl.rat the petitioncrs fot theit personal rcquirc'ments ancl [:rmi]v ncccssities rvantcd to sell the subject flats. It is submitted that rvhen thc pctiuoncrs hare approached the tespondcnt No.6 to obtain rhc valuation ccrtit'icate and encumbrance certificate in thc month of NIar, 2022 bur r<t thc urter shock and sulprise of the petit.ioncrs, ther camc to knorv that thc responclcnt No.2 addrcssed a letter to the rcspondent Nos.5 and 6 not tcr transfcr the land and building bearing N{.C.FI.No.6-2,12 situated at ,.C.Cluards, Hvderabad and further came to knorv that respondent No.2 passcd an ordcr datcd 05.05.2009 rvhetein the rcspofldent No.2 opined that thc transfer of immovable property bearingN{.C.FI.No.6-2-.12, ..(1.(iuards, Fllderabad is declated void and furthcr came to knorv that somc suits are Rlcd by the G.P.A.Holdcrs of thc petitioners in thc namc rrl' the pctitionets befote thc cir.il court idc().S.No.772 <rl' 2072 and batch t;n the ftlc of X ,\ddirional(-hicf Judge, Cin'(iivit (i rurt, I lt,detabad qucstioning thc orders of thc respondenr No.2. ''I'hc said suits u'crc dismisscd fot default for non-prosccution.
