An interlocutory application seeking condonation of a 205-day delay in representing the writ petition was allowed. The underlying writ petition was subsequently dismissed.
The interlocutory application seeking condonation of delay was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
MAIN CASE No:
W.P.No.14060 of 2023
PROCEEDING SHEET
| Sl. No. |
Date | ORDER | OFFICE NOTE |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2. | 23.06.2023 | HCJ & NTRJ | |
| I.A.No.1 of 2023 This interlocutory application has been filed |
Transferred to i/o folder, before corrections, if any. |
||
| seeking to condone the delay of 205 days in representing the related writ petition. For the reasons stated in the supporting affidavit, this interlocutory application is allowed. |
|||
| _________ HCJ |
|||
| _________ **NTRJ ** |
|||
| W.P.No.14060 of 2023 | |||
| Writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal. (vide separate order) |
|||
| B/o. vs |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 205 days in representing the writ petition should be condoned.
B/o
HCJ
NTRJ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
