The High Court of Telangana disposed of a writ petition challenging the inaction in receiving teacher recruitment applications. The Court found the cause no longer survives for adjudication due to efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3304 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THESTATEOF TELANGANA AT'HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
SATURDAY, THE TWENTYTHIRDDAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICENAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETI TloN NO:1'105 OF 2018
Between:
Jannioalli Ramanamma. Wio: Sanieevaiah'Aged about 30 years, CasteSC' OiC:'Unemptoyed, Fl/oH.No.5-37, KethepalleVillage, PangalMandal, Mahabubna!ar -District,-5Ogt 20, State of Telangana.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article226 oflhe constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in theaffidavitfiled therewith,the High court may be pleased to issue writ, order or directionmore in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the inaction ofthe Respondent No.2, in Receiving applicationof the Petitioner for the Teacher RecruitmentTest in School Education Department, for the post of secondary GradeTeacher (SGT) Notification.No.5312o17 dated.21-1}-2017 issued byRespondentNo.2, thoughthe Petitioner if fully Eligible, andproceeding toclose the last date for the receiving application on 06- 01-2018 as illegal, arbitrary,discriminatory; violation of Art.14'16,19(g),21 and 371D of constitution oflndia and consequentlydirectthe RespondentNo.2 to Receive the applications of thePetitioner, withoutinsistingin the interest of justice.
:1
IANO:1OF2 018
Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to grant lnterim Direction to the Respondents to Receive the application of the petitioner and extend the last date for the submission of online application by giving appropriate time to the Petitioner without insisting.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAMESH BURA
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR EDUCATION .
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI D. BALAKISHAN RAO, SC FOR TSPSC
The Court made the following: ORDER
t:'
I
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RA'ESHWAR RAO I
WRIT PETITION NO.11O5 OF 2018
ORDER:
Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication.
closed. No order as to costs.
SD/. T. TIRUMALADEVI ASSISTANT REG6TRAR
//TRUE COPYII
SECTIONgFFICER
To,
TJ cJP Yt-
HIGH COURT
DATED:2310912023
ORDER
WP.No.1105 of2018
r(' .1 '
'y r':
1.r
$
I
11 s$
DISMISSING THEWRIT PETITION
AS INFRUCTUOUS
WTHOUT COSTS.
a-<ofta w- i,lilo
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives the cause of action due to efflux of time.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Jannioalli Ramanamma
State of Telangana
TSPSC
NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
