Disposed

K.Aruna v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC16 Dec 2023WP/10773/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition under Article 226 and Section 151 CPC, the High Court of Telangana observed that WP No.942 of 2014 was withdrawn. Consequently, directed the Additional Collector to dispose of the related appeal on merits, and disposed of the main writ petition without costs.

What did the court decide?

Directed Additional Collector to dispose of the appeal in W.P. No.942 of 2014 on merits; Writ Petition dismissed without costs; pending applications closed.

K.Aruna Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³¹⁸³ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA" ATHYDERABAD (Speciat Originat Jurisdiction)

¶3

SATUEDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTH_REE"--"

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY

¶6

-.,1

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 10 773 0F 2023 Eetween:

¶8

l. K.Aruna Wo K.santhosh Kumar Age 57 )€ars, Occ: House Hold No^l-8-16312, Rd no.5, Ganeshpuri Colony, New Di{sukhnagar, Hyderabad.

¶9

K.Anjani Devi Wo K.Venkataraman Age 6O years, Occ: llousehold R/o 14-197, Rd t'to.3, Ganeshpuri Colony, New Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad.

¶10

S.Manjula Wo S.Madhusudan Rao Age 53 years, Occ: Household No^l-8-L6312, Rd no.5, Ganeshpuri Colony, New Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad.

¶11

B.Sandhya ryo B.Gopal Rao Age 51 years, Occ: Household No^l-8-16312, Rd no.5, Ganeshpuri Colony, New Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad.

¶12

M.Venkateshwar Rao S/o late M.Sheshagiri Rao Age 49 years, Occ: Business F/o 1-8-163/2, Rd no.5, Ganeshpuri Colony, New Dilsrkhnagar, Hyderabad.

¶13

M.Aruradha Wo late M.Narsimha Rao Age 56 years, Occ; l-lousetrold, R/o 3-5-259, Sripada Apartments, Flat No.2O4,Mttalwadi, Narayanguda. Hyderabad.

¶14

M.Priyanka Wo A.Srikanth D/o late M.Narsimha Rao, Age 35 years, Occ : Household, R /o 3-5-258, Sripada Apartments, Flat No.204, Vittalwadi, Narayafguda, Hyderabad.

eu#ril##{i,m-*

#,'l#m"tff'nt**,

AND

..Petftioner/s

ffi;#,#?ms;?*,

2.The Disb-rct Collector rGnga Reddy Disbict.

¶22

3.The Addifional Collector !€nga Reddy District.

¶23

fiff##tr*,:rl,offEnn,*

¶24

S.Bolla Seethaiah S/o Balaiah ffi*#sf{ffifii:,fl#i'-

¶25

j! u.,, *,,,,, ftillHifi,,f}#fi tr##i'

¶26

T,Kotha Madhu S/o Bashaiah ffi , x:H,"s:;'^T[ffi fl;,:#,il . ilu Kl 1 7 / c

¶27

K,, 7, c #ffi#-#:1,,m"y"ffi:rh^64ry

¶28

rd$*#ff ffi1#,:m &,, K,,7, c

¶29

¶30

l0.Smt.K.Malathi flo Krishna D/o Dashaiah Age Major, Occ: House Hotd, R/o H.No.2-3-64ilK1LIC Ilew Premlfagar, Amberpet, Hyderabad.

¶31

1l.Smt.Akula Yadamma W/o fuvaiatr Age lfajor, Occ: Household, R;/o Ibrahimpatnam Wllage & Mandal, Ranga Reddy Dstrict.

¶32

12.Kotha Vijaya laxmi ryo late Bashaiah Age Major, Occ: House Hold R/o H.No.2-3-644K1tlc

¶33

I'lew PremNag , Amberpet, Hyderabad.

¶34

l3.Kotha Rekha W/o late Madhu Age major, Occ: House Hold R/o H.No.2-964ilKltTc

¶35

New PremNagar, Amberpet, Hyderabad.

¶36

l4.M.Prabhakar Rm S/o late Sri Venkat Rao Age Major, Occ: Business, No 6-32, Madhurapuri Colony, Almasguda, R.R.District.

¶37

ls.M.Ranga Rao S/o late Venkat Rao Age Major, Occ: Business, No 6-32, Madhurapuri Colony, Almasgu-rda, R.R.District.

¶38

16.M.C,eetha Devi Wo late Narsimha Rao Age Major, Occ: Household, R/o Mankha.l Village Mahestwaram Mandal, R.R.Dstrict

¶39

lT.M.Hanurnanth Rao S/o late Kishan Rao Age Major, Occ: Business, R/o Mankhal Village Maheshwaram Mandal, R.R.Dstrict

¶40

l8.M.9inivas Rao S/o late Kishan Rao

¶41

Age Major, O,cc: Business, R/o Mankhal Viltage Maheshwararn Matdal, R.R.Dristrict.

¶42

tg.M.Sridha{ Rao S/o late M.Rama Rao Age Maiof, Occ: &lsiness, R/o Nandiwanaparthy Mllage, Yacharam Mandal, R.R.District.

¶43

2O.M.Ranganath Rao S/o late Yadagiri Rao Age Major, Occ: Business, R/o Nandiwanaparthy Village, Yacharam Mandal, R.R.District.

l' I

ffi;i.'Hti#lfuIfiffiH-",,

¶48

?-r;O.r""rt^{Ram S/o LateM. paraflkush} Rao fff #:fi:ffi:."""*"'^{*r" ni#,,iJ,il'Jii,}

¶49

,t,!. .;1 +

¶50

itr:Hffiffi ffi#}:]riri:#i;,::

¶51

ms,#f[i,q,fr*1,fff^{)!,!;gp;^ " u"}

¶52

##,#lifH*Hn1r.,,,,

¶53

tY,if#'"H,",'.(",fr '9"ffi,.tri!:

¶54

[:i:'IXi?''

¶55

ffi ffiyg:,mlri,T,1',r;,*"

¶56

i;#Hr##rli",,?)pe5n*,,*,"

¶57

##Till#jffiF,r?:nHs:"

¶58

,#:";,Hil""Ym;1,-,.:.H*,, i#ffi i#ilrfrffiI*"%:&T,'fl -ff:ffi ;*"

¶59

'--
<br>,.-'.,-,-.

¶60

¶61

33.grftan Mwab Khan S/o^{late Md.KaramAli Khan} Age Major, Occl Eusiness, R;/o^{16-4-131, Charrchalguda} Hyder$ad.

¶62

34.Khalida Murad Khatoon D/o late Md.Karam^{Ali Khan} Age Maitr, Occ: Ho-rsehold, R/o 16-4-131, Chanchalguda Hyderabad.

¶63

3AShans Khatoon Dy'o late Md.Karam Ali^Khan Age^{MaFr, Occ:Household Rlo l6-+13L,Chanchalguda} Hyderabad.

¶64

36.Modshah Nararaz Khan S/o late^{Md.KaramAli Khan} Age Major, Occ: Business, R/o 16413f, Chanchalguda \ Fryderabad. ..Respondent/s

¶65

Petition Under Article^{226 of the constitutionof lndia praying that in the} circumstances^{stated in the affidavit filedtherewith,the High court maybe} pi"*"6 io issue a writ order^{or directronmore particularlyone in the natureof} furit of Mandamus to^{declare the action of the officialRespondentno.4(RDo) in} not inclined to^{pass any ordersin Proceedings no J/1436/2O2Oby passing} i;pi;; order dated si-lz-zozz^{on the groundof pendencv of WP No'942.of} Zi.O\ +" on the^{file of Hon'ble High Court on meritsdespite of the direction by the} Joint Collector,^{R.R.Districtfor Denova enquiryas illegal, arbitrary' un-} and against the^{rules of lnam AbolitionAct 1955and consequently} "on.titutionat Jir""i in" Respond-ent^{No. 4 to disposeof the proceedingsno. Jl1436l2O2O} daled 31-12-2O22^{on merits expeditiously}

¶66

t.A.NO:'| OF 2023

¶67

PetitionUnderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatintheClrcumstancesstated intheaffidavitfiledinsupportofthepetition,theHighCourtmaybepleasedto directtheRespondent'No.4i.eRDotodisposeoftheProceedingsNo. Jt1436t2O2O daled^{31-12-2022on merits as expeditiously'}

¶68

Counsel for the^{Petitioners: SRI K'R'K'GARGEYA}

¶69

Counsel for the^{RespondentNos.1to 4 : AGP FOR REVENUE}

¶70

Counsel forthe^{RespondentNos.5to 36 : --}

¶71

The Court made the^{following ORDER}

¶72

,[ I

¶73

¶74

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN^REDDY

¶75

WRIT PETITION No.10773 OF 2023

¶76

ORDER:^(ORAL)

¶77

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and leamed^Assistant Govemment Pleader for Revenue appearing^{for respondents.}

¶78

[n view of the withdrawal of W.P. No.942 of 2014^on 16.12.2023, no further orders are required to be^passed in^{this writ} petrtron.

¶79

[t is represented by both the learned counsel that the appeal^filed by the petitioner in W.P. No.942 of 2014 challenging the order^dated 3l 12.2022 passed in case No.J/143612020 on file of respondent No.i - the Revenue Divisional Offrcer & Inam Tribunal, lbrahimpatnam Division, Ranga Reddy District is reserved for orders.

¶80

As innocuous relief is sought by the petitioners, notice to respondents No.5 to 36 is dispensed with. Respondent No.3^The AdditionaliJoint Collector, Ranga Reddy is directed to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner in W.P. No.942 of 2014 on^mcrits, rvithout bcing influenced by the order passed herein, by issuing notice to the petitioners and respondents No.5 to 36 and by^giving

¶81

¶82

opportunity of hearing to them, within a period of three (3) months from the date ofreceipt ofcopy ofthis order. Further, request is made by the leamed counsel for the petitioners in W.P. No.10733 of 2023 that the petitioners may be permitted to prefer statutory appeal to challenge the order dated 31.12.2022 passed in case No.Jl143612020

¶83

on file olrespondent No.3.

¶84

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no

¶85

order as to costs.

¶86

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending

¶87

in the writ petition stand closed

¶88

SDI K. AMMAJI ASSISTANT^RE ISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION FFICER

1 . The Principal^{Secretary, Revenue Depa(ment'Secretariat'State of}

¶93

Telanoana at HYderabad' 2 The D-istrict Coliector,^{Ranga Reddy District'} 3 The Additional Collector,^{Ranga Reddy District} - 4 iiri" iilriliir.i o*isionii'oni"6r,^{tbrahimpatnam Division at Rasannasuda} Turkvamzal, R.R.District. s. iil'CC;r'ejj^{FoiCeuenue,HighCourt for the Stateof relanganaat} Hyderabad. [OUT] 6 7 oi "-cb Two CD i" CopiesS'd f.R.f'Cargeya,^{Advocate[OPUC]}

¶94

SA kCJP

¶95

: t II II ! l ! ! i I

¶96

HIGH^COURT

¶97

DATED:16112l,2023

¶98

1 t{E STAI 6
c
d zTJANzoz4
i,
i:-

,/
DE

¶99

ORDER

¶100

WP.No.10773^{ot 2023}

¶101

DISPOSING^{OF THE W.P}

¶102

WITHOUT^COSTS.

¶103

U
G's

K.Aruna v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Aruna v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Mathrubhuumi Infra Vs Sri. C. Lakshmikar Reddy

Gundelli Kanakaiah Vs The State of Telangana and 5 others

M/s Raghava-Plr (Jv) Vs Smt. a. Santhi Kumari, IAS

Kamarouthu Vamshi, Vs Dandugula Maisaih

Tadakamalla Mohan Rao and another Vs M/s Kalyan Ram Rice Industries and 10 others

Ballem Venkateswarlu Vs The state of Telangana and 3 others