Allowed

M/s. Goldquest International Private Limited, v. Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by the Principal

Telangana HC8 Dec 2023WP/10405/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the withdrawal of WP No. 10405 of 2014 filed by petitioners challenging multiple FIRs. The respondents took no objection, and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn without costs.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the Writ Petition accorded; Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn without costs.

M/s. Goldquest International Private… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^32ee l

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 10405 OF 2014

¶7

Between:

¶8

1 M/s. _Goldquest lnternational private Limiled, Rep. by its Managing Director Ms. ..Pushpam Ap_palanaidu. Basement Floor, The Rain Tree "Ffjc; G.7, McNichols Road, Chetpet, Chennai.

¶9

2 Ms. Pushpam Appalanaidu, D/o Appalanakiu, Aged 51 years, Occ Business Basement Ftoor, The Rain Tree Ptace No.7,^-McNiclioti noiO,^-Ct Chennai-600031 "tp.f

¶10

.....PETITIONERS

¶11

AND

¶12

Govemment of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by lhe principal, Secretary, Department of Home Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hyderabab.

¶13

The Director General of Police Lakdikapool, Hyderabad.

¶14

CBCID Hyderabad Rep. by the Additionat Director General, of police Hyderabad.

¶15

The Additional Superintendent of potice CBCID, Krishna District.

¶16

The Additional superintendent of police cBclD, visakhapatnam District.

¶17

The Additional Superintendent of police CBCID, East Godavari District.

¶18

The Additional Superintendent of police CBCID, West Godavari District.

¶19

The Superintendent of Police CACID, SpSR Nellore District.

¶20

The Station House Officer Governerpet police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District (Crime No.'1 4412008).

¶21

10.The Station House Officer Penamaluru police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District (Crime No.230/2OO8).

¶22

11.The Station House Officer Penamaluru police Station, Viiayawada, Krishna District (Crime No.21 1/2008)

¶23

12.The station House officer ll rown police station, vUayawada, Krishna District (Crime No.'186/2008).

¶24

13.The station House officer Kuchipudi porice station, Krishna District (crime No.38/2008).

¶25

'l4.The Station House Officer, Central Crime Station, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District (Crime tto.STZbOel.^{'-'- ''}

¶26

15 The station House officer, Annavaram porice station, East Godavari District (Crime No.67l2008 and 85/

¶27

'l6.The Station House Officer,.ll Town police Station, Kavali, SpSR Nellore District (Crime No.37l2OOtj ).

¶28

.....RESPONDENTS

¶29

Petition Under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or Direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus decraring the inaction of the respondents .r and 2 in not clubbing the murtipre FrRs registered on the fires of respondents g to 16 in various districts of the State of Andhra pradesh in pursuance to the Memo No.479l5c-8r2007-1, dated 26-0g-2008 issued by the 1st respondent herein as illegar' arbitrary and unjust and to crub murtipre F.r.Rs on the fire of the respondents I to 16 as shown in the Annexure- 1 and transfer them to the 3rd respondent herein in order to further investigate the matter and fire a singre charge sheet and to conduct common trial,

¶30

l.A.NO :1 OF 2O14 P.NO:12 58 0F 2014)

¶31

Between

¶32

1 . Govemment of Andhra pradesh, Rep by the principal, Secretary, Department of Home Secretariat Buitdings, Saira'uao1 ivoijiJujo.

¶33

The Director General of police Lakdikapool, Hyderabad.

¶34

GBCID Hyderabad Rep. by the Additionar Director Generar, of porice Hyderabad.

¶35

The Additional Superintendent of police CBCID, Krishna District.

¶36

The Additionar superintendent of porice cBCrD, visakhapatnam District.

¶37

The Additional superintendent of porice cBCrD, East Godavari District.

¶38

The Additional Superintendent of porice cBclD, west Godavari District.

¶39

The Superintendent of potice CBC|D, SpSR Nellore District.

¶40

The Station House Officer Governerpet pollce Station, Vrlayawada, Krishna District (Crime No. 1 4412008).

¶41

1O.The Station House Officer^{Patamata Police Station,Vijayawada'Krishna} District^(Crime No.230/2008)-

¶42

'l 1.The Station House Otficer Penamaluru Police Statbn, Viiayawada,^Krishna District (Crime No.21¹ /2008)

¶43

12.The station House Officer^{ll Town Police station, vijayawada, Krishna District} (Crime No.186/2008).

¶44

.13.The Station House Officer Kuchipudi Police station, Krishna District (crime No.38/2008).

¶45

14.The Station House Officer,^{Central Crime Station, Visakhapatnam,} Visakhapatnam District^{(Crirne No.5/2008).}

¶46

15.The station House officer,^{Annavaram Police station, EastGodavari District} (Crime No.67/2008 and 85/

¶47

'16.The Station House Officer, llTown Police Station, Kavali, SPSR^Nellore District^(Crime No.37l2008).

¶48

.....PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS

¶49

AND

¶50

1 M/s. Goldquest lnternational^{PrivateLimited, RgO. by its Managing Director} Ni;. iGh;;, Appalanaidu^{BasementFloor, The Rain TreePlaceNo'7'} McNichols Road, ChetPet,^Chennai.

¶51

Ms. Pushpam^{Appalanaidu, D/oAppalanaidu,Aged 51 years' Occ} tlsiness - erse."n[ rrol, ' rne iain Tree i]tace No.7,^- Mctlichols Road, chetpet, Chennai-600031.

¶52

.....RESPONDENTSMRIT^PETITIONERS

¶53

Petition under section^{151 cPC praying thatin the circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed^{in supportof the petition,the High courtmay be pleasedto} vacatetheinterimordersdated03.04-2014passedinW.P.No.1040512014. r.A.NO :2OF 2^{014 (WP} P.NO:13061 OF²⁰¹⁴⁾

¶54

Petition under section^{151 cPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated} in the affidavit^{filed in supportof the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto} direct the respondents^{police restraining them from further registering of multiple} F.l.Rs with regard to^{alleged common obiectarising out of sametransaction} forthwith,^pending disposal^{of the abovewrit petition'}

¶55

l.A.NO:3 OF 2014^(WPMP .NO:13062 OF 2014)

¶56

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent police not to arrest the 2nd petitioner in connection with the First information reports registered against her_

¶57

Counsel for the Petitioner : Ms.VIJAYA LAKSHMI, ADVOCATE FOR Ms R.ANNAPURNA

¶58

Counsel for the Respondents : SRI SAt RAM, AGP FOR HOME

¶59

The Court made the following ORDER

¶60

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.^{V. VENUGOPAL}

¶61

WRIT PETITION No.1O4OS of 2014

¶62

ORDER:

¶63

Ms. Vrjaya Lakshmi, learned counsel representing

¶64

Ms. R. Annapurna, Iearned counsel for the^{petitioners submits} that no further orders are required in the Writ Petition^and therefore, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition.

¶65

Mr. Sai Ram, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for Home appearing for the respondents takes^no objection to the same.

¶66

Permission as sought for is accorded.

¶67

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶68

Needless to mention, the petitioners are at liberty to work out the remedies available under law.^{No costs.}

¶69

Miscellaneous Petitions,^pending if any, shall stand^closed.

¶70

SD/- P.Ch. NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANTEEGI'TRAR //TRUE COPY// './ / SECTION OFFICER

¶71

To 1. Two CCs to GP For Home, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶72

One CC to Ms R.Annapurna, Advocate IOPUCI

¶73

One CC to Sri Sai Ram, Advocate^(Opuc)

¶74

Two CD Copies

SA GJP ?ft\

HIGH COURT

DATED:0811212023

ORDER

WP.No.10405 of 2014

DISMISSING THE W.P

AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.

¶82

@wq, rr\r^lzq,

M/s. Goldquest International Private Limited, v. Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by the Principal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. Goldquest International Private Limited, v. Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by the Principal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahankali Baskar, Khammam Dt., Vs the State of Telangana, Rep Pp and 5 Otrs.

Shaik Mannar Patel S/o Bashu Patel Vs The State of Telangana

Binay Mohta, Vs The State of Telangana

Penumati Eshwar, Warangal Dist. Vs the State of Telangana, Rep. by Its P.P., Hyd

Bojja Srinivas Vs State of Telangana And Another

K.V.V. Prasada Rao, Hyd and 2 Othrs Vs State of Telangana, Rep. by P.P., Hyd and Anr.