The High Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition under Article 226 and dismissed the petition as withdrawn under Section 151 CPC.
Permitted withdrawal of writ petition; dismissed petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3377 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Speciil Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 10389 OF 2023
Between:
Kanneganti Vivek Tej, S/o.Ramakrishna, Aged about 34years, Occ. Business, Rl/o.Flat No. 401, Maruthi Enclave, Yellareddyguda, Hyderabad- 500 073.
...PETITIONER
AND
)
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of theConstitution of lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filedtherewith, the High Court maybe pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction moreparticularly onein the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents2 and 3 in interfering with the petitioners private property, an extent of 1650 sq.yds of land and the structure thereupon, situated in Sy.No.1 ofHasmathpet Village, BalanagarMandal,
Medchat-tt4alkajgrri Disr ;t, unilaterally assumrng the sarne to 1,,,' th: propertyof the non-official rr:sporrit nls 4 to 6, statedly situatedin Sy' Nc"' 4, 8 and 9 of Hasmathpet village,; sillegal, arbitrary, withoutjuris'lictior,corrtraryto the provisions of the G l-llv ll Act,1955 anrl violative of Artic es 1z,.?.1 ,rnd 300-4 of the constitution oflria and consequentlydirect the tespor dr:ntt; 2 and 3 to refrainf romdo ing scr
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition unde. I er;tion151 CPC prayingthat in the cirr;-rslancesstated in the affidavit filedin r;r pport of the petition, the High oourt r:ry tre pleasedto direct the responderrt :2 and 3 not to interferewith the p()tilioner'speaceful possession and enjoy rent of theproperty,an extentof 1650 st;.yds of land and the structure therer,pr1, situatedin Sy No.1 of Hasma hpel ' lage, Balanagar I\rlandal, lr,4edchal-M;: ll a1 ;iriDistrict.
Counsel.for the Petiti,,ner : SRI P.ROY REDDY
Counsel for theResp,,ndentsNo-1to 3 : GP FOR MA & UD
Counsel for the Resp,ndents No.4to 6 : SRI M.V.RAJA RAM
The Court madethe f, ,ll,rwing: ORDER
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SIIRAVAN KI'MAR
WRIT PETITION No.10389 of2o23
ORDER: eer he Hon'bte the ChleI Justice AIok Aradtg)
Mr. P.Roy Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner.
court to withdraw the writ petition.
4 . Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall
stand closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
SD/-V.KAVITHA //rRUE coPY//ASSlsrANr fjfsrnnn
SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. One CC to SRI P.ROY REDDY. Advocate. tOpUCt 2. Two ccs to the GP for Municipar Adminiskatiori and Urban Deveropment, _l]ignCourt for the State Of Tetarigana at Hyderabad. [OUT] 3. One CC to SRI M.V.RAJA RAM, Advocate.-topucl 4. Two CD Copies. BSK\cJP $r-
HIGH COL RT
DATED:04108,2023
ORDER
WP.No.10:i89 of 2023
/ a.-:a-
. 1tr- S:47
t- {)
/ ' ,i:
i
l:/:r , t:? I I
2 lr l\ j r'! rm
,i.i-.
D|SMlSSlt\ c I HE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRA! VN WITHOUT CO iTS
,.-1
I .. I -./
/ - - l-)
e 7-- \ '(- /'-'l
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Kanneganti Vivek Tej
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
Allok Aradhe
N.V. Shraavan Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
