This order recalls the judgment dated 12.09.2023 in I.A. No. 3 of 2017 in W.P. No. 10205 of 2012 due to submissions by senior counsel. I.A. No. 9 of 2023 is disposed of by a separate order without specific relief details in this text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32s6 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE TWENTYSIXTH DAY OF SEPTEIVBER TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICEMUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
l.A.NO.g 0F 2023
IN
WRIT PETITIO N NO. 10205 0F2012
Between:
Petitioners 1 to 31 are residents ofVelimelaVillage, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Sanga ReddY District.
35.Asangari Balraj S/o. Late Asangari Veeraiah, aged about 30years- 36.Asangari Hari Krishna S/o. Late Asangari Veeraiah, aged about27 years.
Petitioners 3:l to 36 are residents of Velimela Village, Ramachandrapuram, Itrlandal, Sanga Reddy Distnct.
Petitioners 44 to 49 are residents of H.No.16-11-5111C139, Prathap Nagar, Dilsukh Nagar, Hyderabad - 500036.
...PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that rn the crrcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to modify the order dated 12.O5.2023 in l.A.No.3 of 2017 in W.P.No.'10205 of 2O12
by directing the 1't respondentto receivethe amountof Rs.31Lakhs from the petitioners within a period of two weeks from thereceipt of a copy of the orderin the said LA. and by further directing the1't respondentto complywiththe directions of this Hon'blecourtin w P.No,10205of 2012 within a periodof four weeks thereafter.
This petition coming onfor hearang, upon perusingthe petitionand affidavit filed in support thereof and uponreading the Order dated 12.09.2023in l.A.No.3 of 2017 in W.P.No.102O5 of2012 and upon hearing the arguments of Sri S Srinivas Reddy, senior counsel andSri Ramakrishna Pativadaon behalf of the petitioners and GP for Revenue on behalf ofthe Respondents,the Court made the following ORDER:
This application is filed seekingamendment to the order passed by this Court in l.A.No.3 of 2017 dated12.09.2023-
This Court, having consideredthe submission made by Sri S.Srinivas Reddy, learned Senior Counsel,is of the consideredview that it would be appropriate to recall theorder, dated 12.09.2023and pass appropriate orders afresh.
Accordingly, the order, dated12.09 -2023passedin l.A.No.3 ol 2017in W.P.No.1O205 ol 2012 isrecalled and l.A.No.9 ol 2023 is disposedof by a separate order.
SD/. T. TIRUMALA DEVI ASSIST NT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// L]D SECTION OFFICER
To,
2 DRAFTS
HIGH COURT
DATED:2610912023
-<--
,l
l
0 4 [i!
, ORDER
I.A.NO.9 0F 2023 IN W.P.NO.10205 0F 2012
DISPOSING OF THE I.A.NO.g OF 2023 &
RECALLING THE I,A.NO,3 OF 2017 IN W.P.NO.lO2O5 OF 2012
n
-.-t
a=
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should modify the order dated 12.09.2023 in I.A. No. 3 of 2017.
Raiam (Kalal) Lakshmaiah and Others
The District Collector, Sanga Reddy, Medak District
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sanga Reddy, Medak District
The Tahsildar/Mandal Revenue Officer, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Medak District
The State of Telangana
Mumminen Sudheer Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
