Disposed

Smt. Daiva Krupa v. Smt. B. Chandrakala and 5 Others

Telangana HC16 Feb 2023WA/823/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed three interlocutory applications before disposing of Writ Appeal No.823 of 2022. The applications sought leave to file an appeal, condonation of a 41-day delay, and dispensation with filing a certified copy of an order.

What did the court decide?

Applications for leave to file appeal, condonation of delay, and dispensation with certified copy order were allowed.

Smt. Daiva Krupa Vs Smt. B. Chandrakala and… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

¶2

MAIN CASE No: W.A.No.823 of 2022

¶3

PROCEEDING SHEET

¶4

Sl. No.	Date	ORDER	OFFICE NOTE
4.	16.02.2023	HCJ & NTRJ
		I.A.No.1 of 2022 Heard Mr. Ch.Venugopal, learned counsel for the	Transferred to i/o folder, before corrections, if any.
		appellant and Mr. J.Narender, learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2/writ petitioners. We have also heard Mr. J.Amruth Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondents No.3 to 6.
		This interlocutory application has been filed seeking leave to the appellant to file the related appeal. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, this interlocutory application is allowed.
		_________ HCJ
		_________ NTRJ I.A.No.2 of 2022
		Heard Mr. Ch.Venugopal, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. J.Narender, learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2/writ petitioners. We have also heard Mr. J.Amruth Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondents No.3 to 6.
		This interlocutory application has been filed

¶5

¶6

seeking to condone the delay of 41 days in filing the related appeal.
After hearing learned counsel for the parties and
for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the
delay of 41 days in filing the related appeal is condoned.
Interlocutory application is accordingly disposed
of.
_________ HCJ
_________ NTRJ I.A.No.3 of 2022
This interlocutory application has been filed
seeking to dispense with filing of certified copy of the
order dated 28.09.2022 passed by the learned Single
Judge in W.P.No.37786 of 2022. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and
for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, this
interlocutory application is allowed.
_________ HCJ
_________ NTRJ W.A.No.823 of 2022
Writ appeal is disposed of. (vide separate judgment). B/o. vs

Smt. Daiva Krupa v. Smt. B. Chandrakala and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Daiva Krupa v. Smt. B. Chandrakala and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Mallikarjuna Rice Industries Vs the Income Tax Officer

M/S.Mallikarjuna Rice Industries Vs the Income Tax Officer

M/S Nova Medicare , Hyd. Vs the Income Tax Officer, Hyd.

B. Siddartha Reddy Vs B. Venkatrajireddy

B. Siddartha Reddy Vs B. Anasuyamma

The National Small Industries Corporation Ltd. (Nsic) Vs The State of Telangana