This single-line order dismisses the writ appeal as infructuous based on counsel's submission. No order for costs was passed.
No order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in the appeal shall stand closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3318 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTYSECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEABHINANDKUMARSHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICENAMAVARAPU RAJESHWARRAO
wRlT APPEAL NO: 443 OF 2013
Writ Appeal under clause 15 of theLetters Patent preferred against the order dated 19.03.2013 in W.P.No.172O of2012 on the file of the High Court.
Between:
K.Dhanunjaya Reddy, S/o.K. Narasimha Reddy, aged about 46years, Rl/o. Flat No.408, Sai SpurthyEnclave, Venkatagiri, Yousufguda Post, Hyderabad - 500 045.
...APPELLANT
AND
...RESPONDENTS
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(WAMP. NO:1119 OF 2013)
Petition under section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support ofthe petition,the HighCourt maybe pleased to suspend the operation of the orderof the learned Single Judge in W'P.No.1720of 2012 dated 19.03.2013 to the extentthe recoveryof alleged excesssalarypaid vide Memo No.RUS/2/2010 dated08.09.201 1 is refusedto be interfered withand also Memo No.RUS/2/2010dated08.09.2011
Counsel for the Appellant:SRI C. SUMON Counsel for the RespondentNo.'l:D PRAMADA Counsel forthe RespondentNo.2: GP FOR LABOUR The Court Delivered the following:JUDGMENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
RIT PPE No 43 0F 201
JUDGMENT: (Per AKS,J)
Learned counsel for the appellant has informed the Court that the subject matter of the Writ Appeal has become infructuous.
as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous Applications, if any, pending in this Writ
Appeal. sha ll stand closed.
SDIK.SAILESHI DEPUW yilsrRAR SECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED:2211112023
JUDGMENT
WA.No.443 of 2013
1 HF S T r€
(
A
J v
0 3 JAN 2024 j
Io
,+
gO
Dtrs PAI C
DISMISSING THE WRIT APPEAL
AS INFRUCTUOUS
WITHOUT COSTS.
oruro
'w \ \ru"
K.Dhanunjaya Reddy
Rajiv Udyogasri Society
Sri D. Srinivasulu
Abhinakumar Shavili
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
