Writ Appeal dismissed as the cause does not survive due to the bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh into Telangana and reorganization under the A.P. Reorganisation Act, 2014, effective 02.06.2014.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3393 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI
WRIT APPEAL NO: 279 OF 2011
Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent filed against the order dated 23.3.2011 and made in WP.No.1569 of 2011 and pass on the file of the High Court.
Between:
The Govt. of lndia, Ministry of Home Affairs, Rep. by its Home Secretary, North Block, Central Secretariat, New Delhi.
..APPELLANT/RESPONDENT No. 1
AND
...RESPONDENTAA/RIT PETITIONER
...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT No.2
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2011(WAMP. NO: 639 OF 2011)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Judgment dated 23.3.2011 in WP.No.1569 of 20'1 I pending disposal of the writ Appeal.
l.A. NO:'t OF 2012(WAMP. NO: 3206 OF 2012)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.1/Appellant to furnish the complete and true report of the chapter 8 of the Justice Sri Krishna Committee daled 3O-12-2010 along with the all annexures to this Hon'ble court
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(WAMP. NO: 779 OF 2013)
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Permit the petitioner/a ppella nt to raise the additionalgrounds after modifying para 14 of the memorandum of grounds of appeal in the interest of justice and pass
Counsel for the Appellant: SRI TANGEDA DAYANANDA RAO( NOT PRESENT) Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI G. MALLA REDDYREPRESENTING FOR SRI G. MOHAN RAO
Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: SRI K. VIVEK REDDY
The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
TIIIi HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI
WRIT APPEAL No. 279 of 20ll
JUDGMENT.. (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Alok Aradhe)
None for the appellant.
Mr. G. Malla Reddy, learned counsel represents Mr
G.Mohan Rao, learned counsel for respondent No.1.
organization Act, 20 1 4.
Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, stand closed. There
shall be no order as to costs.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/. T. KRISHNAKUMAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR
SECTI OFFICER
\
To, 1 One CC toSRITANGEDA DAYANANDARAO Advocate [OPUC] 2 5;; cc i" Snic. MoHANRAo'Advocate to.P-ucl- 3 5;; cc 6 5RiK. Vtvex ReooY, Advocate[oPUC] 4 Two CD CoPies BN GJP
HIGH COURT
DATED:0411212023
JUDGMENT
WA.No.279 of 20'11
..<br>6d
,"A
I
i(/ .$ il
oe. .j/
i"
/
*
t.t !{
DISMISSING THE WRIT APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS
c/
The Govt. of India, Ministry of Home Affairs
Sri M. Narayan Reddy
M. Sanga Reddy
ALOK ARADHE
ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
