Dismissed

The New India Assurance Company Limited, Secunderabad. v. Smt. Angeeth Sakri Bai and 4 Others

Telangana HC8 Nov 2023MACMA/589/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

M.A.C.M.A. disposed of by consent in terms of the settlement Award passed by the High Court Lok Adalat on the Auto Accident date 09.09.2023; delay in filing appeal condoned.

What did the court decide?

Dismissed the Motor Vehicle appeal as withdrawn; confirmed the impugned order and decree; continued Lok Adalat award; refund court fee.

The New India Assurance Company Limited… — Motor Accident Claims | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

:e!

¶2

l IJ

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶4

WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER f . TWOTHOUSANDANDTWENWTHREE I

¶5

PRESENT t I 1 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA t MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL^NO: 89 0F 2012 1

¶6

r Appeal filed under Section 173 of M.V.Act, aggrieved by the Jugement^and Decree in M.V.O.P.No-616 of 2009 dated.29.04.2011^{on the file of the Chairman,} : tllr t m- I Additional District Judge, Medak at^Sangareddy. a l{l :::r'

¶7

' THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED', Rep.bv its Divisional F. Manager,^. Third^{party , ClaimsCell,Madan MohanBuilding' R.P.Road,} , Secunderabad.'^rv';

¶8

¶9

...AppellanURespondent No.3

¶10

AND

¶11

¶12

SMT. ANGEETH SAKRI^BAl, w/o^{Late Vittal, aged 34 years, Occ: Household} ! Ryo Ramachander^{Thanda H/S. Nagdhar Village, Kalher Mandal, Medak}

¶13

l^{. i,} rDistrict^, ',,)',

¶14

2 'tnqeeth Prashanth, S/o Late Vittal, aged 15 years, minor rep.by their mother and natural^{guardian, Respondent No.1Ryo RamachanderThanda H/S.}

¶15

I Nagdhar Village, Kalher^{Mandal, Medak District}

¶16

3 Kum. Angeeth Naveena,^{D/O Late Vittal,aged 13 years,Minor, rep-by their} mother a-nd natural^{guardian, Respondent No.1. Rl/o Ramachander Thanda} H/S. Nagdhar Village,^{Kalher Mandal, Medak District}

¶17

¶18

i I I ....Respondents/Petitioners t

¶19

....Respondents/Petitioners

¶20

4 kashinath, S/o Guruna{h, aged^{major, Ownerof Auto No. AP23 V 7115 R/o} Abbenda Village Narayankhed^{Mandal, Medak District.}

¶21

5 Patloth Ramuloo, S/o Roopal^{Naik, aged major Ownerof Auto No. AP 23 V} 71 15 Rl/o Abbenda Mllag,e^{Narayankhed Mandal, Medak District.} j

¶22

...Respondents/Respondents

¶23

l.A- No: 1 oF 201r(MACM AllP. No:4450 F 20111

¶24

ietition under Section 151 CPC^{praying that in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition, the High Court may be pleased} condone the delay of 35 days^{in filing the appeal.} l !'i

¶25

E i!

¶26

¶27

t i -f IT ;"J.I for the Appellant: SRI KOTA SUBBA RAO &i I : Coun;t, for the Respondents I to 3: SRI PALLE SRIHARINATH t Ita ThJCr ."4" the follovrring Jugement: t i r{ t J I ! ,}T tt I i i, t ! i't, i: ;t ,( II 1II l I t i l- . rt)ril iti I +,f i t ll f :'ll I . {l l i '(,'iihi,_ ,j t-^.l :1 li .11ii ,ti ,, it ;l: -r, i I ,i Ll I: il Ili! d. 6* 7'A + irIlr F T i :l i t I .t '.1 r. b I

I I

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P. SREE SUDHA

¶33

M.A.C.M.A. No. 589 0F 2012

¶34

JUDGMENT:

¶35

On 09.09.2023, the matter was settled before the Lok Adalat held at Hyderabad and an Award was passed by the Lok Adalat.

¶36

In view of the same, the M.A.C.M.A. is disposed of in terms of the Award, dated 09.09.2023, passed by the Lok Adalat. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶37

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand

closed.

:i iit N'I:l r.l

I t i ti: I

{II SD/. K.AMMAJI ASSISTANT GISTRAR $ t //TRUE COPY// L SECTION FFICER To,: $ 1. One CC to SRt. KOTA SUBBA RAO Advocate IOPUC] I . 2. IOne CC to SRI. PALLE SRIHARINATH AdvocaG [oP|.ic] ' 3. ;Two CD Copies i I I r NslI: : i^nlft ,'^: ;::i

¶42

',if, {! t

¶43

¶44

r--$_i -: ilt -_l;.^ir Fl T"^-' * * , H|GH,COURTT9 ,,,i . ) I l I $ l. II i DATED: 08t11t2023 I : I .11 ,i * .i, l .4,I ,L' ' f: ,, t t t, :" I l{ i itif .. n 7 tsI JUDGEMENT i ,tt ,rol.f,"".u 8e or 2012 .i 1 .1,i x i'! ?#?J, ,,,, t I 1^{t\E STAre.} t. .{ ,. c v t'i ,II$ : $ti of 2 3^JAN 202[ a i -i: * "f $ DISPOSING THE MACMA * O65 p4i c?.'.lC _,. ! IN TERMS OF,AWARD PASSED is. BY THELOKADALAT. ,, i r. a tt.i: .{ r,ti. ,.& .; ,., i ,l,:i, .t,,: u-t:. .!tI :.abt ,.; l .i 1 'fi,' 'Hl. f,: if.. ,f1 ,.. t i ) ). :.. .1 s '. iI t ,,.-..1 :1.{ -:, .$.tl:t i 6 ,,.

¶45

E-^-

¶46

\94.,

¶47

BEFORE THE^{LOK ADALAT} HIGH^{COURT LEGALSERVICESCOiIAAITTEE} (HIGH COI,RT fOR^{THE STATE OFTEI-AIIGANA,HYDERAAAO)}

¶48

[Under^{Section l9 of the LegolServicesAulhoritiesAct'1987(Cenllol Act)l}

¶49

Date: 09-09-2023

¶50

Pf esent:1 .Hon'ble Sri^{JustaceG.v-seethapathy,}

¶51

-'-(Former Judge of^{erstwhile AndhraPradeshHigh Court)} Chairman,

¶52

SER 2.Smt.T.Bata^{JaYasree,Advocate,} Member 3.Sri Y. Bata Murati,^Advocate, HIGH^COURT Member aniI LOK^ADALAT I 57t lrtACtrtA.No.5 89^{of 2A12} (Before the l'lon'ble High^Court) Srate ol1 AGAINST M.V.O.P.No .61^{6 ot 2@9} {On the file of the^{Chairman, Motor Accidents} Claims Tribuna[-cum' I Addt. District^{Judge, Medak at 5a} ngareddy)

¶53

Between:

¶54

The New lndia^{Assurance Co. Ltd.,} Reo.bv its Divil^{Manager, Third Party} cdim; cett,^{Madan lvlohanBuitding,} R.P. Road, Secunderabad.

¶55

...Appettant/ResPondent^{No. 3}

¶56

AND

¶57

Smt.Angeeth^{Sakribai, W/o.late'Vittat,'} Ased 34-Yrs,^{occ: Household, R/o' Ramachander} itanaa, H/i.Nagdhar^{Vittage,KalherMandal'} Medak District.

¶58

Angeeth^{Prashanth, S/o.LateVittat,aged15 Yrs'.}

¶59

f-fl,ior, ReP.by their Mother and natural guardian' ResP.^No.1.

¶60

Kum. Angeeth^{Naveena, D/o' Late'Vittat,aged 13 Yrs'}

¶61

Mir-, R6p.by their Mother and naturat guardian' Resp.No.1.

¶62

"'Respondents/^Petitioners

¶63

Kashinath,^{S/o.Gurunath,aged Major,} .

¶64

;;;r. of iuto No.AP-23-v'7115, R/o' Abbenda Vittage, lv\andat,^{Narayankhed, MedakDist'}

¶65

Pattoth Ramutoo^{S/o.Roopat Naik,aged Major,} Owner of Auto^{No.AP-23-V-7115'R/o'Abbenda} Vittage, Mandat,^{Narayankhed, lvtedak'}

¶66

...Respondents/^Respondents

7f+fX""^-

AWARD

This is an appeal fited by the appellant/lnsurance Company.

¶72

The Learned counse[ for the Appe[ant/ rnsurance company represented that the lnsurance Company is withdrawing the appeat filed by them.

¶73

3' The said representation is recorded and the appeat is dismissed as withdrawn, confirming the Judgment and Decree or il,u"cifiirztilrnli below. The amount if any remaining unpaid to tt. ctairliiir;f;hlii.; deposited by the rnsurance company within one ,ontri i.oi ii; ;:ia;; receipt of the award, atong with interest. il^{'. , -:a:. ,. ,,,} 'iFI I!'

¶74

On such deposit, the Respondents/petitioners ar" p"rrnit-teJt,o ,r,,h#a,, Ii:':ff :ffi.i,ffi ,,JT:;",'r"''*reappoiuonmil#;#";bi";+;;t:A;

¶75

5' This Award shall be subject to verification of cross appeal/cross objection, if any, fited by the Respondents, otherwir the parties are at liberty to apply for recall of this Order/Award.

¶76

Court fee paid on this appeat shall be refunded.

¶77

No costs.

¶78

ere E aqdBol eQ"j}tar '-. h.
For The New lndia Assu(anco Co. Ltd.
"""'Mi-**,
OULY CONSTTIUTED AI IORI,I?
Appellant / Respondent No.3/
lnsurance Com
I
CHA]RA,IAN MEiIBER
ER
sER
H GH couRT
[6nr )
*
s,
-:--

The New India Assurance Company Limited, Secunderabad. v. Smt. Angeeth Sakri Bai and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The New India Assurance Company Limited, Secunderabad. v. Smt. Angeeth Sakri Bai and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Masjid Managing Committee Vs Ahmed Sharif (Since Deceased per LRs)

Sangam Jagan Vs Mohd Moizulhaq and Anr.

The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Vs Maraboina , Gudese Veeraiah

United India Insurance Company Limited, Secunderabad. Vs Adulla Bhaskar Reddy and Another

The Ap State Road Transport Corporation and Anr. Vs Smt.Mothiya Bai , Motya

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Suryapet Vs Vundra Madhava Reddy and Another