when the appellant-insurance company is questioning the quantlrm on the admitted facts, when the court has an occasion to look at the award passed by the Tribunal and on the face of it, the award is passed u.ith improper multiplier and in the right of the settled law when certain aspects were not considered and the just compensation is not awarded by the Tribunal, in those cases including the non-pecunary heads, just because they have not filed any cross objections, that itself cannot be a ground for the court not to enhance the compensation. In a way, it is doing injustice to the claimants who are entitled for the compensation. As it is mentioned in the Act just and reasonable compensation, it should be the Enclcavour o[ the court to see that the claimalts are getting a just and reasonable compensation. The interest of the insurance company also have to be considered. Court has balanced the interest of the insurance company as well as the interest of the respondents herein in this case while awarding the compensation. Though the Tribunal has taken Rs.1O,OOO/- as income of the deceased, has not considered the 1o% future prospects, had it been, it would be come to Rs. looo/- then the income would be Rs.11,ooo/- and if 173.a is deducted it would come to Rs.3666/- then the monthly income of the deceased would tre Rs.7334X12 and the Tribunal instead of applying multiplier 9 as applied 8. If multiplier 9 is applied it would come to Rs.7 ,92,O72 / - There are three claimants they are entitled for the
