Civil Revision Petition filed against an execution court order in a possession suit. The High Court held the cause no longer survives as the execution petition was closed and possession delivered, dismissing the petition as infructuous without costs.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3260 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.SANTHOSH REDDY
CML REVISION PETITION NO: 5159 OF 2017
Petition under Article 115 of the CPC, against the Order dated 17-08-2017 passed in E.A.S.R. No. 1533 of 2017 in E.P. No. 5 ol 2017 in O.S. No.251 of 2008, on the file of the Additional Judge-Cum-Vl Senior Civil Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad
Between:
All are F/o H.No.23-1-'1016, Khaja Ka Chilla, lv'loghalpura, Hyderabad
...PETITIONERS/CLAIM PETITIONERS (DHR)
AND
teI'- +L-)1,/,r i,(
(JDRyRESPONDt: htTS,'RESPONDENTS
CRPMP. NO:6705 OF 201 7
Petition unc :r Section 151 cpc praying that n the (lircumstances stated in the affidavit file, in support of the petition, the High corrrt may be pleased to stay all further pr r:eedings in E.p. No. S ol 2017 in C.S;. lo ZSf of 2008 including disposs€;singl the petitioner from their House Ber,rrinrS No.23-1-1016, admeasuring'185: q. Yds. situated at Khaja Ka Chilla, Mogralpuia, Hyderabad.
lA NO:1 OF 2018
Petition und r Section'l 51 cpc praying that in the circurnstances stated in the .aff idavit file( n supporr of the petition, the High cou rt may be pleased to extend the stay pa;sr-'d in cRPMp No, 6705 of 2o1z in cRP Nr:. 5159 of 2017 on 03.10.2017.
Counsel for the Pe itioners: SRI. p SHIV KUMAR
Counsel for the Re pondent Nol: SRI GULAM MUSTAFA RABBT\NI
Counsei for the Re: pondent No.2 to 7: None Appeared
The Court made thr following: ORDER
(-;
THE HONOTIRABLE SRI JUSTICE A.SANTHOSII REDDY
CIVTL REVISION PETITION NO.5I59 oF 2017
ORDER:
This Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the order dated 17.08.2017passed inEA SR No.1533 of 2017 in Ep No.5 ol 2017 in O.S.No.25lof 2008 by the leamedAdditional Judge-cum-Vl Senior Civil Judge,City Small CausesCourt,Hyderabad.
Z_Learned co'.rnsel lor thepetitioners has subrnitted that thc Ep was filed for deliveryof possession. The said EP was closed on 08.12.2017 andpossession was also delivered. Hence, the cause in the present Civil Revision Petitiondoesnot survive for adjudication.
dismissed asinfructuous. No costs
Pending miscellaneous applications, ifany, shall stand closed.
Sd/. P. PADMANABHA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// qD
SECTION OFFICER
3.One CC to SRl. GULAM MUSTAFA RABBANI, Advocate[OPUCI
PR
kam
a\
HIGH COUI:T
ASR,J
DATE D: 1 6l( 212023
ORDER
CRP.No.S15l ot 2017
,4 .-l- . -!
i:a
.j
t, .a) 2 1 r,lAH Ziin
<br>
DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTOUI} WITHOUT C(,STS
6
fr)
?,ql1,lLt
Mohammed Ayub
Ayesha Begum
Mohammed Akber
Shahvar Fatima
Masooda Begum
Zakir
A. Santhosh Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
