Civil Revision Petition was allowed by this court, dismissing it as infructuous on the submission that the matter in the trial court has been settled.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous due to settlement of the underlying matter by the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
.-F.-t-!Fr---:-.-7r!F:=:-'r:.t,8!r
[3260 ] |' IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA ii-"". {jrl AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.SANTFIOSH REDDYI . ,.; i:, CIVlL REVISION PETITION NO: 4692 OF 2017 ')',:-:r',;; I *: Petition under section 22 of the AP Building(Lease, Rent and Eviption)'..ii #l;-S{il' .. -:j,,"..1j.r -r controi Aa oi CCcTnrtLie izTionititrtion of lndii bgainsi ttre order dated 13t41fi ':', '"l,li'rlir'r, .',1r. r,iin .RCNOa2O af 2014 AdditionalRC in RA.No. 185 of 2015on the file of the:Cou!'tof , ,, " ' the Chief Jtdge City Small Causes Court at Hyderabad Betwee n i : , ,,i.;i ....f ll.l :l!.lF.r_i.!i:i ;4i-*ifiit :" I :l : :I'l $r:{' ,1 ,]cl: ! ,,_,, ir ),I ;1, ,ik ;t _, ."i;: ,il :iiil iilftri'lI ]it irl,iltit .il . : ,j) t )i:jili rir
it iti{II
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SANTHOSH REDDY CIVIL REVTSION PETITION NO.4692 OF 2017
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter has been settled in the trial Court and the subject matter has become infructuous.
While recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Miscellaleous petitions, if any, pending in this
criminal petition, sha1l stand closed.
il
SD/-V.KAVITHA ASSISTANiT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// (p SECTION OFFTCERi: To, ',;l.r 1 ,,r , .: 2.) , ., .The Additional The Chief Judgerent City controller at SecunderabailSmall causes court at Hvderabad '':,:f at::r .;One CC to SRL K JYOTHT PRASAD Advocate IOPUCI 4-,pne CC to SRl. THUMU CHANDRA SHEKAR Advocat'e tOpUCl 5 .: Two CD Copies KKS gs( .i. :' i ,1....' r. i,' ' . ',,. +,.,:: |:,: 'ji::! ..ti I,i'i":l'4i .. ,: , '.j-i 'tiF:'ilrit
gs(
i i I
HIGH COURT
DATED:2810212023
ORDER
CR,P.No.4692 of 2017
1 g S IAI(- o
(
v
r;l
.L
c)otz 22 JuNNB
.,1'
/.)
+ Dtaei 1l-
i-i'r
I
DISMISSING OF THE CRP
AS INFRUCTUOUS
' :,.i, i:r
+
\ Er \zr
b
C
w
Petitioners
Respondents
A. SANTHOSH REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
