Allowed

Mohammed Abdul Aleem v. The State of Telangana and another

Telangana HC5 Jun 2023CRLRC/516/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed IA Nos. 1 and 2 of 2023 filed in Criminal Revision Cases. Based on a memorandum of compromise and proof of payment, the Court quashed the conviction and sentence against the petitioner in the underlying case, directing payment of a fine to Director, Sainik Welfare.

What did the court decide?

IA Nos. 1 and 2 allowed; Conviction and sentence in C.C. No. 284 of 2018 quashed contingent on payment of Rs. 10,000 fine.

Mohammed Abdul Aleem Vs The State of Telangana and another — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE G.ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY

¶6

l.A.NOs.1 AND 2 of 2023 IN/AND

¶7

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 516 OF 2022

¶8

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 516 OF 2022

¶9

Revision filed under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C against the Judgment daled 0610712022 passed in Crl.A. No.824 of 2019 on the file of the Court of the lV Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, at Nampally, confirming Judgment dated 21 .08 2019 passed in C.C. No.284 ol 2018 (Old CC No 421 of 2018) on the file of the Court of the XXIV Special Magistrate, Hyderabad

¶10

Between:

¶11

Mohammed Abdul Aleem, S/o. Mohammed Abdul Hafeez, Age. 50 Years, Occ Business, Mohammed Abdul Hafeez, Hyderabad - 500 098

¶12

ACCUSED/PETITIONER

¶13

AND

¶14

'1 . The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad.

¶15

RESPONDENT/RESPONOENT

¶16

Mr. Mohammed Abdul Kareem, S/o. M.A. Ghani, Aged about 54 years, Occ Business, R/o. C/o. F.K. Traders Premises H.No. 22-1-116, Kali Kaber, Chaderghat Road, Hyderabad.

¶17

...COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT

¶18

lA NO:^'f OF 2022

¶19

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of the original certified copy of Crl.A. No.824 of 2019 Dated 06-07 -2022 on the file of lV Addl. Metropolitian Sessions Judge, at Nampally, and CC.No.2B4 of 2018 dt 21-08-20 19 on the XXIV Special Magistrate at Hyderabad.

¶20

lA NO: 1 oF 2023

¶21

Between:

¶22

Mr. Mohammed Abdul Kareem. S1o M A Ghani. Aged about 54 years, Occ. 3H:'JS,i',iI'3",ti:tit[,:tll""pie'iseJitiiil:i-tro,xiri(aoli"'"

¶23

...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/ DEFACTO COMPLAINANT

¶24

AND

¶25

1 Mohammed Abdul Aleem S/o Mohammed Abdul Haf eez, Age. 50 years. occ Business, Mohammed ioori'ii?ij"i,'itva;#j_ soo os8

¶26

RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER/ ACCUSED

¶27

The State of Telanoana by its Public Prosecutor' High court of

¶28

.. Telangana at HydelabadRep

¶29

RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶30

Petition under section 320(6) cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavrt fired in supportor ttu-p?tiiiln, tne High court mav be pleased to permit the oeritioner to'"orpiori!"'ii.''c"." in GRLRC No. si6 ot 2022. in Crt.A.No. B24t2O1g, aatea OA,_i_ZOZi oI tn" fite of Hon,bte IV Addt Metropotitan and Sessions .luage at Namprl;, ; il interest of justice.

¶31

IA NO: 20F 2023

¶32

Between:

¶33

Yl'-Y9hrT,n"O^nbd_ut^Kareem,S1oM A Ghani. Aged about 54 years, Occ. 3H:'J:i;,iI'fi "9i?'i;[,1ii,1""p'e'i'esuiv:;i1:iiid"k:;i:E:?"""

¶34

...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/ DEFACTO COMPLAINANT

¶35

AND

¶36

1 Mohammed Abdul Aleem S/o Mohammed Abdul Hafeez, Age. 50 years. occ Business, Mohammed Aoori'fr?1,"i,'ivG;;;;j: 500 o9B

¶37

RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER/ ACCUSED

¶38

2 Ilg,-S-|"t"^{oj.Tgtangana,. Repby its pubtic prosecutor, High Courrof} Juotcature at Hyderabad.

¶39

RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶40

¶41

stated Petition under in the affidavit fired section in 320(6) support ci.p.c., of the'peiition, praying that the in High the couit circumstances,rv -n" pleased the petitioner to compromise the case in crlrc ruoI sto of 2oiz n cd.A.No.824120t9, dated 06-7-2022 on the fite of Hon,bte rv nJor-r,rr.troporitrn And Sessions Judge, At. Nampally, in the interest of justice.

¶42

Counsel for the Petitioner in Crl.RC and Respondent No.1 in l.A.Nos.1 and2of2023

¶43

: SRt. SUBRAMANYAM DARABOTNA

¶44

Counsel for the Respondent no.1 in Crl.RC and Respondent No.2 in I.A.Nos.1 and 2 ot 2023 : ASSISTANT PUBLTC PROSECUTOR

¶45

Counsel for the Respondent no.2 in Crl.RC and Petitioner in l.A.Nos.1 and 2 oI 2023 :SRI. L REDDI KRISHNA KUMAR

¶46

:SRI. L REDDI KRISHNA KUMAR

¶47

The Qourt made the following: ORDER

¶48

HON'BLE SMT..IUSTICE G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY

¶49

l.A.Nos.l and 2 of 2A23

¶50

IN/AND CRIMINAL REVISTON CASE No.516 of 2022

¶51

ORDER:

¶52

By order dated 28.04.2023, thc matter was ref'erred to Fligh Courr Legal Services Comrr itLee fbr identitying rhe parties and fbr recording the comprornise entercd between thcm.

¶53

Basing on thc said diroctions. thc Secretary. [cgal Services C'orrrrniltec has idcntilicd borh the panrcs antl r.ccordr:rl thc tronrprornisc Menrorandunr ol cornprorlise u,as alstt takcn ttn record.

¶54

In view of thc above. I .A.Nos. I and 2 ol 2023 arc allowed. Consequently, thc orin'rinal revision case is alkrlvcd and the convicl.ion and sentence against thc peril.ioner in C.C.No.284 ol 2018 (old C.C.No.42t of' 20lt) on rhc tilc ol XXiV Spccial Magisrrare. IIyderabad. are quashcd sub.iect Lo payment ol'an anrount ol-Rs.10.000/(Rupees^'['en l'housand) in lavour of' I)irector, Sainik Welfare, I{yderabad. (Savings Aic. No.52188926279, Stare Brn[< of India. Shantinagar IJranch & 20070. IFSC Codc: SBIN00200?0. MICTR No.500004057) ivithin lirur rvecks tiorn roday. and lilc pr.ool ot the surnc into the [(cgistrr.

¶55

¶56

4 Pending rnisccllaneous applications, ilany, shall stand closed

Sd/- K. SAILESHI

DEPUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

!]D

SECTION OFFICER

To,

'1. The lV Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad (With Records if any)

¶64

The XXIV Special Magistrate, Hyderabad

¶65

One CC to SRl. SUBRAMANYAM DARABOINA, Advocate [OPUC]

¶66

Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad (OUT)

¶67

Two CD Copies

¶68

Alo4g with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise

¶69

Note

¶70

Amount paid by Sri SUBRAMANYAM DARABOINA, Counsel for the Petitioner towards imposed by Cost of Rs. 10,000 /- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) directed by the Hon'ble Court , dated. 05.06,2023 to the Director, Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad ( Savings A/c. No. 52188926279, State Bank of lndia, Shanthinagar Branch & 20070, IFSC Code : S81N0020070, NICR Bi, 500004057) and an amount of Rs.10,000/and filed Memo of Proof of Compliance USR.No 61560 ot 2023 dated:l7.07.2023. pr

r:+E

HIGH COURT

DATED: 0510612023

onben

CRLRC.No.S16 ot 2022

A l.a.'
:.e
tl-
iE ot sEPzm ai
.L.',
r! -i' ..,

¶78

ALLOWING THE CRL.RC

¶79

AND I.A.NOS 2 AND 3 OF 2023

¶80

.,/ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT^HYDERABAD

¶81

BETWEEN:

¶82

Mr. Mohammed Abdul^{Kareem S/o M.A. Ghani,} Aged about 54^{years, Occ: Business,} R/o C/o. F.K, Traders^Premises H.No.224-1 16, Kali Kaber, Chaderghat Road, HYderabad

¶83

.. Petitioner/Accused

¶84

AND ,

¶85

Mohammed Abdul^Aleem S/o Mohammed Abdul^Hafeez Age: 5O Years, Occ: Business, Hyderabad- 500 098

¶86

.. . Respondents/ Defacto^Complainant

¶87

2, State dJ Telangana Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana,^HYderabad

¶88

Respondent

¶89

]OINT MEMO

¶90

May it please your lordshiPt

¶91

It is submitted that I^{have given a complaint before Hon'ble XXIV} Special Magistrate AU^{Hyderabadagainst Accused, the same W'as} numbered as CC.No.284l2O!8/^{(Old Case No CC No.421l2018).After} the tilal, the said cc was ordered^{In my favour vide Its orders dated.} 21-O8-2019 on the file of^{XXIV Special MagistrateAt Hyderabad,It Is} further submitted that, aggrieved^{by the said ordeis, the accused had} preferred an Appeal vide Crl. A^{No.B24l2019on the file of Hon'ble Iv} Additional Metropolitan and^{Sessions,At Hyderabad'The same was} heard on merits and the said Hon'ble^{Court was plebsedto confirm the}

¶92

'' - tr-ll

¶93

¶94

juogme,rt passed rn aC No.284/2018 by rts orders cjated 24-Og_2019. the same is extracted herein below:

¶95

Extract of the O rder:

¶96

In the res u It, the Criminal rmD uq ned lud qm ent d ate d21-oB-2019Apo eal rs dismtss edc onfirmi nq the assed bv th e Ld, xxtv Sot. Ma IStrate in^('(- No.2 B4/20 1B (ord CCN o.421/2 o1B ). thecourt below IS di d to im Dlem ent and ex ecute the sentence; the office is d i rected to send the case reco rds to the co ncer ned court issUE NBW aqain sta poeli ant/ accused .

¶97

2' I submit that the intervention.9f the we, wishers and erders of :n.^{O:ln parties setUed ,fr" -",.'u-rn,.ub,, our} of the court. Accordingry' I have entered into a compromise with the Accused and signed ',Memorandum of Comprom,se,, dated iB_O7_2022 wherein and as per the agreed terms and condjtions as laid down in the said compromise, I have received any amou,nt of Rs.3,05,000/_ (rupees three rakhs five thousands onry) form the accused. The modes of such paymenE was, i.Rs.2,0O,OOO/_ by way of On Demand pay No.O514O2 dateq^18-qz,2o1? drawn in my favourr and drawn on Centrar bank of India, Rein Bazar, Hyderabad. 2. Rs.1,O5,OOO/_ ,.rr"-.','O* thousand onry) by way of cash for which I acknowredge the receipt, The copies of the Memorandum of compromise dated 18-07_2022 and the Demand Draft dated La_07_2022 are enclosed herewith for the perusal of this Hon'ble Court.

¶98

That due to the said reasons, I came forward to withdraw the compraint for which I am arso executed an Affidavit stating that I am ready to withdraw the above said case.

¶99

¶100

It is submitted that the^{matter is settled out of the court, I am} ready to withdraw the^{case agajnst the petitioners consideringall the} above circumstances this^{Hon'ble court may be pleasedto quash the} proceedingsinCrl.ANo.B24/2Ol9,clated06-7-2022onthefileof Hon'ble IV Addl. Metropolitan^{And SessionsJudge At Nampally,} otherwise^. the^petitioners and^{their family members will sufter} irreparable loss.

¶101

ItisthereforeprayedthatthisHon'bleCourtmaybepleased4to record the compromise statement^{and quashthe crl.A No.824/20t9,} dated 06-07 -2022 on the^{file of Hon'ble IV AddlMetropolitan And.} sessions Judge At^{Nampally, in the interestof justice and pass such} other order or orders^{may deem fit and properin the circumstancesof} the case. )

¶102

Hence, this loint Memc.

¶103

Hyderabad DA.[E:27-03-2023

¶104

Petitioner No.1

¶105

Counsel for^Petitioner

¶106

W,tf
Counsel for (espond9nt

¶107

Petitio r No.2
&i*
l-*..=:g=:.

Mohammed Abdul Aleem v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammed Abdul Aleem v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S. Sathish Rao Vs The State of Telangana

DiIli Srinivas Vs The State of Telangana

Kurakula Kannappa Vs The state of Telangana

M/s. Advik Laboratories Limited, Vs State of Telangana

Mohd Hafeez and 3 Ors. Vs Mohad Yousff

Tejavathu Bhava Singh, Nalgonda., Vs the State of Telangana, Rep Spl.Pp for CBI Cases.