Disposed

Ravi Kumar , Ravi Shastry v. Velde Manasa Kalyani and 3 Others

Telangana HC25 Jul 2023CRLRC/2439/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court closed two criminal revision cases seeking to set aside appellate judgments in matrimonial matters. The court noted the parties had mutually dissolved their marriage via a consent decree and agreed to close the pending proceedings as no further orders were necessary.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Revision Cases No. 2439 of 2012 and No. 1915 of 2015 along with pending miscellaneous petitions were closed.

Ravi Kumar , Ravi Shastry Vs Velde Manasa… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[32ss ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL

¶6

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NOs: 2435 OF 2012 AND 1915 0F 2015

¶7

CRL.RC.No. 2439 ot 2012

¶8

Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 Rliw 401 of Cr.P.C., aggrieved by the Order dated 31 .10.2012 passed in Crl.Appeal No. 35 of 2O11 on the file of the Additional [Vletropolitan Sessions Judge, Cyberabad, NTR Nagar, Hyderabad, preferred against the Judgment dated 20.01.2011 passed in D.V.C.No. 4 of 2009 on the file of the lll lt/etropolitan [t4agistrate, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar.

¶9

Between:

¶10

Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Shastry, S/o Suryanarayana, Age: 33 years, Occ Purohit, R/o' H. No.8-12-81 , Kondurivari Veedhi, Battlaal Bazar, Warangal.

¶11

...REV|SlON PETITIONER/R.No.1

¶12

AND

¶13

Velde Manasa Kalyani, W/o Ravi Kumar, Occ Housewife, Rl/o H.No.2-4119l12lA, Plot No.13, 1st Floor, Sai Nivas, Swaroop Nagar, Uppal, R.R.Dist.

¶14

2- Suryanarayan Sharma, Age: 60 years, Fl/o H.No.B-12-81 , Kondurivari Veedhi, Battlaal Bazar, Warangal.

¶15

Venkanna,, S/o Suryanarayan, Age: 36 years, R/o H.No.8-12-B1 , Kondurivari Veedhi, Battlaal Bazar, Warangal.

¶16

The State of Andhra Pradesh,, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.

¶17

(Respondents No. 2 & 3 are not necessary parties)

¶18

,..RESPONDENTS

¶19

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2012(CRLRCMP. NO: 3656 OF 2012)

¶20

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may^be pleaseid to suspend the Order dated 31.10.2012 in Crl.A.No.35 of 2011 on the file

¶21

of the Addl. Metropc litan Sessions Judge, Cyberabad NTR I'lag:rr, Hyderabad, pending disposal of t re Crl.R.C-

¶22

l.A.NO: 2OF2013(C&@

¶23

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying ihat in lhe circumstances stated in the affidar it filed in support of the petition the H 3h Court may be pleased to vacate thc interim orders granted by this Hc,n'ble Cr>urt in Crl.RC.MP. No . 3656 of 2012 in Crl.RC.No.2439 of 2O12 dated: 05^'12.2(r1tl.

¶24

CRL.RC.No. 1915 of 2015

¶25

Criminal Revision lase filed under Sections 397 & 4( 1 of Or.2.C., aggrieved by the Award dated 09.07.2015 passed in M C.No. 16 of 2012 on th: file of the Judge, Family Court, L.B.Nagar, Rangh Reddy District.

¶26

Between:

¶27

Velide Ravi Shrtstry, S/o. Suryanarayan, Age: 35 years, ccr Purohit R/o H.No 8-12-81 , Kondl rivari veedhi battlaal bazar, warangirl

¶28

...REVIS.IOI{ PETITIONER

¶29

AND

¶30

'1.. Velde Manasa (alyani, W/o Ravi kumar, Age:24 yr:ars, C)cr:. Housewife Rl/o H.No.2-4-1 18/1 2/A, Plot No.13, 1st floor Sai Nivas {lwaro,)p Nagar Uppal Ranga Reddy ttist

¶31

MasterV.Eshwlra Vishnudatta Sharma,, S/o Velide Ravi shasty Minor, Age 3 years, Repre:,ented by his Natural Mother Smt. lVlanasa Kalyirni, R/o H.No.2-4-1 1Bl1 2/A, Plot No.'13, 1st floor Sai Nivas Swaroop Nagar Uppal Ranga Reddy ttist

¶32

3- State of Telang lna, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court Hyderabad

¶33

RI:SPONDENTS

¶34

l.A. NO:^'t OF 2016(ClIL.RCMP. NO: 4785 OF 2016)

¶35

Petition under Section 482 of Cr. P.C praying t rat in tlre circumstances stated ih the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the tiiclh^,lourt may be pleased to vacate the Conditional Stay granted on 22.O9.2)1tt i r Crl.RC.No.1915 of 2015 filed by the lespondent husband and further Cirect tfe Respondent to pay the maintenanc l to the petitioners as per the imprrg red order dated 09.07.2015 in M.C No.16/2012 by the Honourablr: Jurlg':, Family court continuously every nonth without default and further r;rder as th s Honourable Court pleases.

¶36

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(CIILRCMP. NO: 3009 OF 2015)

¶37

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying tlrat in tf re ,tircumstances stated in the affidavi. filed in support of the petition, the l-lir. h^(lourt may be

¶38

pleased to suspend the Award dated 09-07-20'1 5 in lVl.C.No. 16 of 2012 on the file of Family Court, L.B. Nagar, Ranga Reddy pending disposal of the revision-

¶39

Counsel for the Petitioner (in both) : Sri BANKATLAL MANDHANI

¶40

Counsel for Respondent No.1 in Crl.R.C.No. 2439 of 2012 & Respondent Nos. l&2in Crl.R.C.No. 1915 of 2015 : Sri NUTHALAPATI RAJA SEKHARAM

¶41

Counsel for Respondent No.4 in Crl.R.C.No. 2439 ot 2012 & Counsel for Respondent No.3 in Crl.R.C.No. 1915 of 2015 : M/S. VIZARATH ALI, ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶42

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶43

THE HONoURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. V]'I{UIiOPAL CRIMINAL REVISION CASE Nos.2439t OF ilol2 AND 1915 of2O15

¶44

COMMON ORD.ER:

¶45

The Criminal Revision Case No.2439 of 2072 ir; fi.ed seeking to set aside th,r.judgment dated 31.10.2012 in Onminal Appeal No.35 of 2O 1 1 on the file of learned Additionrrl Metropolitan Sessions Jud6,e, Cyberabad, NTR Nagar', H-rclerzrbad. The Criminal Revisicn Case No. I 915 of 20 15 is filec s;eel<ing to set aside the awarrl dated 09.O7.2015 in M.C.Nr.16 ot 2012 on the lile ol Family Cr,urt, L.B Nagar, Ranga Reddy

¶46

)

¶47

Heard Mr. Bankatlal Mandhani, learned cor.rns;el for the petitioner and Mr. Vizarath Ali, learnetl Assistant Pubiic Prosecutor appt aring for the respondent Statr:.

¶48

¶49

Since, the parties to both the Revisiorr Case:; are similar, for the sake o[ convenience, both the cas,es ar€' d sposed of simultaneously

¶50

Learned counsel for the petitioner hk.d ths mt:mo dated 25.O4.2023 vidr LJ.S.R.No.42613 of 2023 anc subrlitted that the marriage betrve, rn petitioner and respondent No.1 r,,as dissolved by .way of decree of divorce on mutua-l cons('nt vidt' or-der dated

¶51

¶52

)

¶53

O9.O3.2O22 in H.M.O.P.No.47 of 2011 on the file of the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, at Bhongir, as per the memorandum of mutual understanding arrived at between the parties. Therefore, submits that no lurther orders are necessary in these Revision Cases and seeks to close both the Revision Cases

¶54

Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Crimina-l Revision Case Nos.2439 of 2012 and 1915 of 20 15 are ciosed, accordingly.

¶55

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shali stand closed.

¶56

//TRUE COPY//

¶57

Sd/.M.RAMANA KRISHNA DEPUTY REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

To,

'l . The Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Cyberabad, NTR Nagar, Hyderabad.

¶63

The lll Metropolitan Maglstrate, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar.

¶64

The Judge, Family Court, L.B.Nagar, Ranga Reddy District.

¶65

One CC to Sri BANKATLAL MANDHAN|, Advocate tOpUCl

¶66

One CC to Sri NUTHALAPATI RAJA SEKHARAM, Advocate tOpUCl

¶67

Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. (OUT)

¶68

Two CD Copies

N:b

A^,-N

HIGH COURT

DATED:25107t2023

;TATE 6
/,10
II
ttl rs
aJ 11
.!.,I
)
/v a'/,,r' /
-\ -./

¶74

COMMON ORDER

¶75

CRLRC.Nos.2439 of 2012 & 1915 of 201i

¶76

CLOSING THE CRIt\4INAL REVISION CASES

¶77

$9
{v<br>1<br>

Ravi Kumar , Ravi Shastry v. Velde Manasa Kalyani and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi Kumar , Ravi Shastry v. Velde Manasa Kalyani and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thadem Ravi Vs the State of A.P.

Shweta Vishwanathan Vs The Reserve Bank of India

M/S. Raghavendra Filling Station Rep., Prope.a.Padmanabham Vs the State of Telangana and Another

Jangampally Rajender, Nizamabad Vs Smt. Jangampally Laxmi, Nizamabad and 2 Othrs

A.Satyanarayana, Vs Smt. a.Rajani

Kandimalla Vidyasagar, Vs Kandimalla Vanjarani, and 3 Others