This High Court allowed the criminal revision petition partially. Since the petitioner and complainant settled the issues with no grievance remaining, the Court set aside the sentence of imprisonment while upholding the liability to pay the cheque amount.
Sentence of imprisonment set aside; Criminal Revision Case allowed in part.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3251 ]
Bail Slip: Petitioner/ Accused released on bail as per Court Order dated 2110812018 in lA No.2/2018 in Crl.R.C.No.2206 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2206 OF 2018
Criminal Revision Case under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C against the Judgment made in Crl.A.No.SO1/2014 dated 1710712018 on the file of the Court of the Vlll Additional District and Sessions Jude, Ranga Reddy Districtpreferred against the Order made in CC No.57l2014(old 420812013) dated311'1012014 on the file of the Court of the Vl Special Magistrate Court, Kukatpally, at Miyapur,Ranga Reddy District.
Between:
K.Suvama, Wo.Srinivas Reddy, Occ - Business, R/o.LlG-580, KPHB Colony, Kukatpally, R.R.District, Hyderabad-500 072
...PETITIONERY ACCUSED
AND
...Respondenu comprainant
lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.PCpraying that in thecircumstances stated in the Memorandum ofgrounds of CriminalRevision Case,the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the orderin directing the petitioner to pay compensation of Rs.12,00,0001 byjudgment dt.17-O7-2018,passedin Crl.Appeal No.901 of 2O14 on the file of VlllAdditional District Judge, R.R.District at L.B.Nagar
lA NO:'t OF 2023
Petitio,l unle :leotron 320(6) of Cr.PC R/w. 482 of Cr [) C pray nq that rn the crrcumst:rr-cet; s a eC in lhe N4emorandum of grounds of l-imir')al Petition, the High Court n-:ry be,,lr, ased to permit to petitioner to compo..l rc the Offence under section 138 of lr IACT and 139 of N_l.Act and acr:uit the Revision Pettttoner/accUSerj lor the offence under Section 13t, of lrl 1.,\Ct- and set aside the convictiorr re(rr)r led in Crl.Appeal No.90'1 of 2014 /lllth l,drlitic nal District and Sessions Judge. t .Fi.District at L.B.Nagar, dt. 17-07 20tti as confirmed in C.C.No.57 ol 201 + o d No.4208 of 2013 on the file of Vlt I Spr:cral l,4agistrate Court, Kukatlxrlly:rt lV yapur, at R.R.District, dt.31-10-2t)14
lA NO: 2 OF 2023
Petition unde llection 320(2) of Cr.PC R/w. 482 of Cr.l) C praying that in the circumstarrcer; s tated in the lr/emorandum of grourds of Crimiral petition, the High Court may be pleased to compromise by compoundinry the offences Under sections .1 38 and 33 of N.l.Act and acquit Revision Pet ti :r n/:rccused for the offences Undr:r Sie, tion'138 of N.l.Act and set aside the crrrvrclron recorded in Crl.Appeal Nr, 90'1 ;f 2014 on the file of Vlllth Additionat l)i:,trict and Sessions Judge, R.R.D strict el L.B.Nagar, dt. 17-07-2018, as conf nn,,rd in C.C.No.57 of 2O14 old No.420€i o 2013 on the file of Court of the Vlth Spe:i,rl tVagistrate Court, Kukatpally at l,4iyirp rr. at R.R.District, dt.31-'10-2014
For the Petitioner : SRI S.R.SANJEEV KUMAR, Advocate
For the Responder I I'1o.2 : PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
For the Responder t I'Jo.1 : SRI R.SRINIVAS, Advocate
The Court made t'le following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.22O6 OF 2018
ORDER,:
I. The Criminal Revision Case is filed questioning the conr,iclron under Section 138 ol thc Negotiable lnstruments Act r88r
Miscellaneous applications pendjng, if arry, shallstand closed.
Sd/-B.SATYAVATHI DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// Gb SECTION OFFICER
To
Kj
\
HIGH COURT
DATED:1210712023
ORDER
.-''
,:-,
t
l,I' il g [l1$ 2$l] 't
l<br>r) " ". t"
CRLRC.No.2206 of 2C18
PARTLY ALLOWIN G THE CRL.R.C
.7-<br>trI\ $
2j' \trv5
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the sentence of imprisonment can be set aside upon settlement of issues between the parties during pending revision.
Whether the criminal revision petition for quashing the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act may be partially allowed on compromise.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
K. Suvama
M. Uma Devi
The State of Telangana
K. Surender
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
