The High Court dismissed a Criminal Revision Case filed under Sections 397 and 401 of CrPC by an accused petitioner who died during the pending proceedings. The Court recorded the submission that the petitioner had died and issued no orders further.
The Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as abated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32ee ]
--
BAIL SLIP : The Petitioner was directed to be released on bail by the order of the High Court dated 20-09-2011 in Crl.RC.M.P.No.2914 of 2011 in Cit.R.C.No.1956 of 2011.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No: 1956 of 201{
Criminal Revision filed under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.p.C. against the Judgment dated 16-09-2011 in Crl.A.No.21 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the X Additional District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Rangareddy District at L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad. Preferred against the Judgment dated 16-02-2010 in C.C.No.277 of 2003 on the file of the Court of the Vl Metropolitan tvlagistrate, Cyberabad at Medchal, Ranga Reddy District.
' rlF: , .:{fi
Between:
G. Anjaneyulu, S/o G.Yella Goud, Age:51 years, Occ: Business H.No.1-2382lDl A, Domalguda, Hyderabad. ...Petitioner/AppellanUAccused
AND
1 . Smt. B-Ganga Bhavani,, Wo B.Suresh Goud, Age:34 years, Occ: Advocate H.No.1-13-81, Lothkunta, Alwal, Secunderabad....RespondenUComplainant 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. ...Respondent
-1i,r'+ra',-1*;' ;";1ffl
Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. V.V. RAMANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent No.l: None Appeared
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Mr. VIZARATH ALl, ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER
I
al
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINALREVISION CASE No.1956OF 2011
ORDER:
\
The presentCriminalRevisionCase is filed aggrievedby the judgment dated 16'O9.2011passedin Crl'A'No'21of 2010 on the file of learnedX Additional District & SessionsJudge (Fast Track Court), RangaReddy District, L'B' Nagar, Hyderabad confirmingthe judgment dated L6'O2'2O1'Opassed in C'C'No'277 of 2003 on thefrle of learned VI MetropolitanMagistrate, Cyberabad, atMedchal,R'R' District'
+. l,earned Assistant PublicProsecutortakes no objection to
e
2
counsel, this Courtis inclined to dismiss the Criminal Revision
Case as abated.
Miscellaneous Petitions,pending ifany, shall stand closed.
SD/- B. SATYAVATHI DEPUW REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
P,"
SECTION OFFICER
,.rtl. /
To,
B
kam/JAK
i II i,1i i
:n. 'ji.
HIGH COURT
,lSffi'
:!ffii,#.',
',Yi: i
DATED:0611012023
.i .., :
::*,tl
i.I'.7q4,,'
.#.t:,l l
l'i:.+.,
;11'r:.1:'
.^;-r';ii
.,F+
l€:r,:[ r,
. ar';,3 .
ORDER
CRLRG.No.1956 of 2011
1 HE STA r€
(.
+ ('
I
oJ
1 S APB ZO24 f.:
+
*
a.€SPATC\ r€O
,ri,l';rd:,
:tliT#l.
,-;1.1'' .r.' :.
'''"{'"
THE CRIM!NAL REVISION GASE IS DISMISSED AS ABATED
0*"'
l:rieYi**l r i
]'ffiiL:-: -!
'.:,i:,ilQx
r+#i&i
-ti^Jr:t|ri:
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the criminal revision filed by the petitioner stands abated due to the death of the accused.
Whether the Criminal Revision Case should be dismissed as abated.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
E. V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
