The High Court, on a criminal revision petition filed under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C., held that the matter had become infructuous due to the petitioner's submission and dismissed the case.
Criminal Revision Case dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OFTELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY ,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN
Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C aggrieved against the orders dated 31.08.2009passed in C.C. No.182 of 2009, on thefile of the Court of the XV Additional Judge-cum-XlX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad.
Between:
...PETITION ERS/ ACCUSED
AND
A.P., at Hyderabad
CRLRCMP. NO:2231 OF 2009
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the orders oi tne XV Addl. Judge -cum- XtX Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Hyderabad, passed in CC.No. 182 of 2009, dt. 31-8-2009, pending disposal of the above Crl.R.C.
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : M/s. HARIJA AKKINENI
Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : Sri MUTHYALA MURALIDHAR
(ADDITTONAL PUBLTC PROSECUTOR)
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.16O8 of 2OO9
ORDER:
This Criminal Revision Case is filed by the petitioner under Sections 397 and 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, aggrieved by the Orders dated 31.08.2009 passed in C.C.No.182 of 2OO9 by the learned XV Additional Judge-cumXIX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad.
As a sequel, pending Miscellaneous Applications, if any,
shall stand closed.
\ \
//TRUE COPY/
Sd/.I. NAGALAKSHMI DEPUTY REGISTRAR
SECTION OFFICER
To,
f!
ll
t t
HIGH COURT DATED i1610212023
ORDER
CRLRC.No.1608 of 2009
1 r{E ST4
(
,>.(.
0 3 [Pn 2[?3
-DISMISSINGTHE CRIMINAL_REVISION_CASE
AS INFRUCTUOUS.
ffi6
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a criminal revision petition should be dismissed as infructuous.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Armoor Pharmaceutical Ltd., rep. by its Managing Director
T. Ravindranath Tagore
Expert Detectives & Security Services, rep. by its Chief Executive / Proprietor, Sri K. Narasimha Reddy
The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Public Prosecutor
D. Nagarjun
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
