Dismissed

Narender Kumar Patel, Hyd v. P.P., Hyd and Ano

Telangana HC12 Jul 2023CRLP/9345/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order dismisses a criminal petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C to quash proceedings in a cheque dishonour case. The High Court observed that the underlying subject matter had already been dismissed and the petitioner failed to appear, rendering the petition infructuous.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition No. 9345 of 2014 dismissed as infructuous; related miscreant petitions closed.

Narender Kumar Patel, Hyd Vs P.P., Hyd and Ano — Cheque Dishonour | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^32e9 ]

¶2

IN HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

WEDNESDAY THE TWELFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9345 OF 2014

¶7

Between:

¶8

Narender Kumar Patel, S/o. Late Sri Vadi Bhai Patel, Occ; Business, No.7-2B12 lndustrial Area Sanath Nagar Hyderabad

¶9

...PETITIONERYACCUSE D

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court Buildings Hyderabad

¶12

Vikram Raj, S/o. Sri Jasraj Shrishrimal, Occ: Chartered Accountant, F/o. H.No. 15-1-5031C110 4lh FloorAshok lVlarket Feelkhana Hyderabad - 500 012

¶13

...RESPONDENTS

¶14

Petition under Section 482 o'f Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.393 oI 2013 on the file of the Court of the XXlll Special Magistrate Court, Hyderabad.

¶15

CRLPMP. NO: 9086 OF 2014

¶16

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in relating to C.C.No.393/2013 on the file of the XXlll Special magistrate Court, Hyderabad, in the interest of justice and in the interest of the petitioner / accused pending disposal of the main Criminal petition.

¶17

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2014(CRLPMP. NO: 13540 OF 2014)

¶18

Petition under Section 482 o'f Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the interim stay orders granted in Cr1.P.No.934512014, dated 27.O8.2O14 until further orders, pending disposal of the Crl.P.

¶19

This Petition c rnting on for hearing, upon^perutrinpl tt e^{l,4e morandumof} Grounds of Criminal^)e,tttion and upon hearing the arguments of Sri^{G. TUHIN} KUMAR, (nol appear:d) Advocate for the Petitioner arrd the l:'ub ic^Prosecutor Rep., by ltAr. Vizar Ltl-r Ali, Assistant Public Proser;utor orl t,ehalf of^the Respondent No.'l ar d of lr4r. SUBRAHTMANYATV KLRELLA'^{(not appeared)} Advocate for the [1es1 ottdent No. 2.

¶20

The Court made the f rllowing: ORDER

¶21

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL

¶22

CRIMINAL PETITION No.9345 oF 2014

¶23

ORDER:

¶24

The present Criminal Petition is filed to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.393 of 2013 on the file of learned XXIII Special Magistrate Court, Hyderabd for the alleged offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, 1988.

¶25

2.. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 14.L1.2O22, 16.06.2023, 06.07.2023. Even today, though the matter is listed under the caption for 'for dismissal', there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

¶26

It has been brought to the notice of this Court that the subject matter of the Criminal Petition in C.C.No.393 of 2O13 on the file of learned XXIII Special Magistrate Court, Hyderabad has been dismissed under Section 256 of Cr.P.C on 17.O4.2Oll.

¶27

On perusing the material before this Court, this Court is inclined to dismiss the Crimina,l Petition as infructuous.

¶28

¶29

Acc:ord ngly, this Criminal Petitirn i; dismissed as

¶30

infructu ou.s

¶31

Mis:t:11 rrreous Petitions, pending if ir r.r', shall stand

¶32

c1o sed

¶33

//TRUE COPY//

¶34

Sd,,.T.JAYASREE ASSII;TANT REGISTRAR /'' (- [J

¶35

SECI'ION OFFICER

¶36

To,

¶37

t The XXlll I pecial Magistrate Court, Hyderabad 2 The Statior l-louse Officer P.S. Panjagutt:r, Hy<le.abad.

¶38

One C(l tc S 1l c. TUHIN KUfVAR, Advocate tODUCI

¶39

Two CCs to h,: Public Prosecutor, High Court for the [;ti,te ()f Telangana, at Hyderrabar (C)UT).

¶40

5.. One C(l to lV-. SUBRAHMANYAM KURELLA, Alvoc,a c rOF,UCl 6. Two CDt^(lc ti,:s

-!-

HIGH COURT

DATED:1210712423

ORDER

)

CRLP.No.9345 of 2014

.z-
,/1,,,t STAr€ o
/:
)2 filjB?m 7 ,iti

¶49

DISMISSI-G'f tlE^('r'1 I'

¶50

e 6

Narender Kumar Patel, Hyd v. P.P., Hyd and Ano

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Narender Kumar Patel, Hyd v. P.P., Hyd and Ano

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Purushothama Chary, Warangal Dt., Vs R.Kavya , Santhoshi, R.R.Dt and Anr, Rep Pp.

M/S. Sehgal Motors Pvt. Ltd., and 2 Others Vs State of Telangana and Another

Dudem Rathamma, Karimnagar., Vs Dudem Narsiah, Karimnagar Dt and Anr, Rep Pp.

Lavarthy Santosh Vs the State of A.P. and Another

N.Ravindra Reddy Vs the State of Telangana and 2 Others

Taher Ali Siddiqui, Hyd Vs Syed Rashed Ahmed, Hyd