Allowed

Singham Kondal and 2 others v. The State of Telangana and another

Telangana HC11 Jan 2023CRLP/9190/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This common order quashes criminal proceedings initiated under Sections 498-A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act after the parties compounded the matter via a joint memo of compromise approved by the Legal Services Committee.

What did the court decide?

Criminal proceedings in C.C.No.514 of 2022 quashed; compromise allowed; undertaking to pay Rs.10,000 to Director, Sainik Welfare.

Singham Kondal and 2 others Vs The State of Telangana… — Dowry and Cruelty | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION No.9190 OF 2022 ALONG WITH I.A.Nos.1 AND 2 OF 2022

¶2

COMMON ORDER :

¶3

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.514 of 2022 on the file of the V Additional Metropolitan Magistrate at L.B.Nagar. The petitioners herein are accused Nos.1 to 3 in the said case. The offences alleged against the petitioners herein are under Sections 498-A, 323 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶4

Heard learned counsel appearing on both sides and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the record.

¶5

During the pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and, accordingly, respondent No.2/defacto complainant filed I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2022 to permit to compound the offences and to compromise the case.

¶6

4. Though this Court vide order dated 18.10.2022 and 30.11.2022, directed the parties to appear before the Secretary, Telangana High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad, for

¶7

¶8

their identification and also directed the Secretary to submit a report , the parties could not attend due to circumstances beyond their control and as such requested this Court to grant permission to appear before the Secretary, Telangana High Court Legal Services Committee. On 30.12.2022, this Court, as a last chance, again granted permission to the parties to appear before the Legal Services Committee. In compliance with the said order, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, Telangana High Court Legal Services Committee has submitted his report, on 09.01.2023.

¶9

5. In the report of the Secretary, Telangana High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad, it is stated that in obedience of the orders of this Court, the petitioners/A1 to A3 and the 2^nd respondent have appeared before him along with their counsel and on examination and verification of their particulars from their Aadhar Cards, they were tallied. Thus the identification of both the parties has been established.

¶10

6. The parties herein have filed a joint memo of compromise stating that at the intervention of the elders, they have settled the disputes between them amicably and 2^nd respondent has no objection to quash the proceedings against the petitioners herein

¶11

¶12

in the above Case. The said joint memo of compromise and the report of the Secretary are placed on record.

¶13

7. In view the said report of the Secretary, Telangana High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad, and also in view of the compromise entered between the petitioners and respondent No.2, I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2022 are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in C.C.No.514 of 2022 on the file of the V Additional Metropolitan Magistrate at L.B.Nagar, are hereby quashed against the petitioners/A1 to A3. Petitioners/A1 to A3 undertake to pay an amount of Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand Only) to the Director, Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad (Savings A/c.No.52188926279, State Bank of India, within a period of one week from today, and file proof of the same into the Registry.

¶14

As a sequel, the miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

K.SURENDER, J

Date: 11.01.2023 tk

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SURENDER

¶19

CRIMINAL PETITION No.9190 OF 2022 ALONG WITH I.A.Nos.1 AND 2 OF 2022

¶20

Dt.:11.01.2023

¶21

Singham Kondal and 2 others v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Singham Kondal and 2 others v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Bandla Anantha Lakshmi Vs The Public Prosecutor

Shwasa Constructions Vs State of Telangana

Yerramsetti Latha , Lavanya Vs The State of Telangana

Bathina Mohan Sandeep Vs The State of Telangana

Saud Ul Haq Vs The State of Telangana

Mohammed Idrees Khan , Idris Khan , Muhad Vs The State of Telangana