Single bench dismissed three Criminal Petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. filed for quashing trial proceedings, noting all cases are in the non-prosecution stage due to pending investigation with no prior intervention orders.
Dismissed all three Criminal Petitions for non-prosecution and closed miscellaneous applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HICH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA A'I HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THETWEN'IY FIFI'HDAY OF APRIL TWO TIIOUSAND ANDTWENTY TI IREII
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE K.SURENDER
Criminal Petition Nos. 6951 7098 and7]285 of2o2l
Crl.P.No.6951 of 2021
Between:
AND
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying that inthe circumstances stated in the Memorandumof Grounds of CriminalPetition, the High Court may be pleased toquashthe proceedings againstthese petitioners/A6 and A7 arising outof PRC No. 97/2020 on the file of the XVI Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate,Cyberabadat Rajendranagar.
I.A. NO: 1OF2021
Petition under Section 482 ofCr.P.Cpraying that inthe circumstances stated in the Memorandumof Grounds of CriminalPetition, the High Court may be pleasedto dispensewith filing of the certified copy
of PRC No.q7/2i l(' orr tl.rc file of XVI Addl. I\lctrc,prrlitan Mrrllistrate Cyberabatl at l(trjcr' 1r atragar.
I.A. NO: 2( F 2021
Pctition un(()r' St'ctiotr 482 of Cr.I'.C prirf inl; '.hat in tlle circumstantes stete I n thc' N{emorantlum of Croun.{s of(l'iminal Pctition, the High Court m y bc plcasccl to stay all furthcr pr,rceec ings against these petitionersT/;\ i ,rncl A7 arising out of PRC No. 97,1:1020 :n tl-re file of XVI Addl. Niletropo itan Magistrate Cyberabad at Rajenclra r rag rr.
This Pt:titior coming on for hearing, u po r p,:rusin11 the Memorandum ol( rountls ol Criminal Petition ;rntl t 1;cn hearing the argumerlts of Sri \ .Saleem, Advocatc for the Petitione r an,l thc Public Prosecutor on beha [,-rf the Respondc'nt No.1 and of t]re Ii,:spondent No.2 not appcaring in pr: sorr or through his counsel.
Crl.P.No.7098 of 20'. L
Between:
Ms.Sarapaka Nagala :ni, D / o. Rajamani, Aged about 23 1.e ar s,()cc-Manager Thantra SPA, R,/o. Jr rilet: Hills, Hyderabad.
...Pctitioncr / Accuscd No.5.
AND
...Responder rts;/ Complainants Petition und, r Section 482 of Cr.P.C prayir g that in the circumstances stalec in the Memorandum of Grounds of(lr lminal Petition, the High Court ma be pleased to quash the proceedirgr; a,3ainst these Petitioner /A5 arisi rg out of PRC No. 96/2020 on the fik: or XVI Addl. Metropolitan Magist a te Cyberabad a t Rajendranagar.
I t ! t I I
I.A. NO: 1OF 2021.
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of the certified copy of PRC No.96/2020 on the file of XVI Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate Cyberabad a t Rajendranagar.
I.A. NO: 2OF 202'l
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings against these petitioner / A5 arising out of PRC No.96/2020 on the file of XVI Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Rajendranagar.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M.Saleem, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of the Respondent No.2 not appearing in person or through his counsel.
Crl.P.No.10285 of 2O21,
Between
Thallapally Annapurna, D/ o. Late Thallapally Devasahayam, Age about. 38 years, Occ. Pvt. Teacher, R/o H.No.2-9-1118, S.C. Colony, Waddepally, Hanamkonda Town and Mandal, Warangal Urbary Hanamkonda District.
AND
...Petitioner/Accused No.4.
..Respondent.
I I 1 I
l
i a
. [lc.s rror rden t / Complainant
Petitron :n it r Section 482 of Cr.l'].C praying that in the circu rns tarrcc':; stnt, cl in the I\lcmoranr-lutn of Crourtcls tll( lrintinal J)etition, the Hillh Corrrt n rr' lre pli.ased h rluash thc proct'cciings against these Petitiorrer/,A4 in C I No. 303/2021 on the file of the IV,\ctdl. Judicial First Class Magistrate rt Waranllal arisirrg out of Cr.N<,.517,'2017 of P.S Subedari, Hananrk rnda fol thc offencc. punishable uncle- s;ections 447, 427, 341 R/rv 34 ol IPC.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition un( er Sectiorr 482 of Cr.[).C pravrnl; that in the circumstances state I in the Mernoranrlurn of Crounds of L rir inal Petition, the High Court nr ry be pleased to stay all further proceetlings against these Petitioner/A, in CC No. 303/2027 on the file of th(, lV rrddl. Judicial First Class Magistr rte at Warangal arising out of Cr.Nc.117 / 2017 of P.S Subedari, I{anamkr nda for the' offenct' under sections 44',', 427,347 R/W 34 of IPC.
This Petrtio: coming on for hearing, upo !r p,-.rusing the Memorandum ol'( irounds of Criminal Petition .rnd ttpon hearing the arguments of Sri It [.Saleem, Advocate for the Pelitione r an,l the Public Prosecutor on beha f of the Respondent No.1 and of the R,:spondent No.2 not appearing in pe son or through his counsel.
The Court made the ollowing: COMMON ORDER:
\ \
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SUR^ENDER
CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.695 1 7098 & 10285 0F 2021
COMMON ORDER:
2021 on the li I olV Additional .Judicial F'irs,t l)lasrr Magistrateat warangal arisrrrlr ur.of cr.No.517ol 20 17 oi P.S.Sirlr,:lari. llienamkonda for the offcr-rces 1unishableundcr Sections .1.]7.1')1', .)11r/rt,34 ol IPC.
closed.
sd/ v. KAVTTHA \SSISI,,\NIREGISTRAR
//TRUEC]PY/ /
s,E,lrio*oFFICER
]CK
,l
I IIGI{ COUR1
DATEI}ZS /0a / 202 \
COMMON OI{I)trl Criminal Petiti_qn\ rs. 6951, 7098 and 70285 of2t2l
*i: q>
Dismissing the Crin inal petitions for non-prosecutior
(4 9lr)et
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the three criminal petitions filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing proceedings in non-prosecution cases should be allowed.
Whether intervention orders have been granted during the pendency of the cases prior to the filing of these petitions.
4 provisions across 3 enactments
Mukkara Srilatha
Devulapally Nagarani
Sarapaka Nagalaxmi
Thallapally Annapurna
The State of Telangana
V.Nagaiah
K.SURENDER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
