Dismissed

Bhanavath Ravi Naik v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC25 Jul 2023CRLP/6777/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Petitioner sought withdrawal of a petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C to quash an impugned order regarding proceedings in a specific trial court. The Court granted permission for withdrawal and dismissed the petition without costs.

What did the court decide?

Permission for withdrawal of the criminal petition granted; the petition dismissed as withdrawn without costs; miscellaneous petitions stood closed.

Bhanavath Ravi Naik Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³²⁵⁴¹

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENWTHREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE G.ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY

¶6

CRIMINAL PETtTrcN NO:6777 OF 2023

¶7

Between:

¶8

Bhanavath Ravi Naik, S/o Kurmiya Naik

¶9

...PENTrcNER

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Telangana, rep.by its (Public Prosecutor) High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad

¶12

Patlavath Sandhya, D/o Pulya Naik

¶13

...RESPONDENTS

¶14

Petition under Section 482 ot Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the order dated. 2'l-04-2023 in Crl.M.P.No.39 of 2023 in S.C. No.90'l of 2017 ordered by the Hon'ble Fast Track Special Court for Trial and disposal of Rape and POCSO cases at Rajendra Nagar

¶15

l.A. NO: 1OF 2023

¶16

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in S.C. No.901 of 2017 arising out of Crime No.150 of 2017 on the Hon'ble FTC for Trial and disposal of Rape and POCSO cases at Hyderabad.

¶17

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of STi.B.RAMULU, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Additional Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1

¶18

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶19

HON'BT,E SMT. JUSTICE G. ANUPAMA CHAKRA'UARTHY

¶20

C:RIMINAL PETITION NO.6777 of 2O2:l

¶21

ORDER:

¶22

Sri. Il Ramrtlu, learned Counsel zL1:p t ring lor the

¶23

petitioner/alc.rsed seoks permission of this tjourt t,r v'ithdraw the criminal petili,^,n

¶24

Permiss :r as sought for is accorded.

¶25

AccorclLr gly, the Criminal Pcrition is dismissccl z'. '..r,ilhdrztlt,r.r. No orcler as to cc)s.s

¶26

Miscella re,lus pe titions, if ar-ry pending irr tl'ris :^-iminal petition shall stand c:lo:el.

//TRUE COPY//

Sd/-l\4OHD S,\NI\ULLAH ANSART ASIiI:;TANI REGISTRAR ( flr

¶31

SECTION OFFICER

¶32

The Judger, I ipecial court for Triar and Disposar of Rape arnd I)ocSO cases, Hyderabad.

¶33

?. 9n"^{CC to S'i BRamulu, Advocate} tOpUCl

¶34

Two ccs ro he' Pubric^prosecutor, tiigh court for the statt: of rerangana at Hyderabad ( )LlT)

¶35

Two CD Cop es;

Kj.

Pmq

HIGH COURT

DATED:251071202.t

ORDER

z4''
I,\I€
,z' q 1\t r- o
,':{.]-''
Y
i
l,
I - I t li-lG 2U2I rlti
\ ,+
).
.:,,

¶42

CRLP.No.6777 of i0123

¶43

l^-q

¶44

ro\c),"

¶45

DISMISSING AS W TI]DRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.

Bhanavath Ravi Naik v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhanavath Ravi Naik v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Puli Madhavi Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. Maram Sugunamma Vs State of telangana

Sri N.Laxman Vs The State of Telangana

Lalit Parasmalji Mehta Vs The State of Telangana

Kaka , Kakarakayala Ravi Vs The State of Telangana

Sajid Pasha Vs The State of Telangana