Dismissed

Md. Ghouse v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC21 Jul 2023CRLP/6449/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment records the withdrawal and dismissal of a criminal petition filed for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The Court allowed the withdrawal of the petition by the bail applicants on the eve of its dismissal, and consequently dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Permission accorded to withdraw the criminal petition, discharged accordingly as withdrawn.

Md. Ghouse Vs State of Telangana — Anticipatory Bail | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

<br>

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR^{THE STATEOF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

:PRESENT:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.LAXMAN

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6449 OF 2023

¶7

Between:

¶8

MD. Ghouse, S/o. Late Shafi Ahmed, aged^{40 years,Occ. Government} Employee, R/o. H.No. 2-8-235, Near Masid,^{Waddepally, HanumakondaCity} and District.

¶9

MD. lmran, S/o. Late Shafi Ahmed, aged 28^{years, Occ. Pvt. Service,R!/o. 31-} 3-561, Waddepalli, Hanumakonda City and^District.

¶10

... Petitioners/Accused No.1 & 3

¶11

AND

¶12

State of Telangana, Through Station House^{Officer, PS Kakatiya Unilersity,} KUC, Warangal District. Rep. by its Public Prosecutor,^{HighCourt of Telangana} at H'herabad.

¶13

.. Respondent

¶14

Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C,^{praying that in the circumsteinces stated} in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal^{Petition,the High Court maybe} pleased to direct the Station House Officer, P.S. Kakatiya University, Warangal District to enlarge/release the^{petitioners/A.1& 3 on Anticipatory Bail in the eventof} his arrest in connection with the Crime^{No. 299 of 2023,dt. '16.06.2023, on the file of} P.S. Kakatiya University-KUC, Warangal^{District, U/s. 42O, 447, 427, 323' 386' 506} r/w 34 lPC.

¶15

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶16

Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C,^{praying that in the circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct} the higher authorities of Police^{Departmentto initiate appropriate action by imposing} suitable sections against the^{lnvestigating Officer,of Crime No. 299 ot 2023' dl-} 16.06.2023, on the file of^{P.S.Kakatiya University-KUC,WarangalDistrict, for} perjury & misleading the Hon'ble Court of ll Additional Sessions^{Judge, Hanamkonda} by filing wrong written objections^{in Crl.M.P.No.241of 2023.}

¶17

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of sri M.P. Kashyap Advoca{e for the Petitione(s) and Addl. public prosecutor for the Respondent.

¶18

The Court made the following. ORDER

¶19

THE HON OURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.LAXMAN

¶20

CRIM INAL PETITION No.6449 of²⁰²³

¶21

ORDER:

¶22

This petition is fited under Section⁴³⁸ of^{Criminal Procedure} Code,'1973^{(Cr.P.C)seeking} to^{grant anticipatory bait to the} petitioners, who are arrayed as accused^{Nos.1 and 3 in Crime No.299} of 2023 on the fite of KUC Potice^{Station,WarangatDistrict. The} offences atteged against the^{petitioners are under Sections420, 447,} 427, 323,386 and 506 read with Section 34^{of the lndianPenat Code.}

¶23

After hearing the petition and when this Court is inclined^to dismiss the petition, learned counsel for the^{petitioners seeks} permission of this Court to withdraw the CriminaI Petition.

¶24

Permission is accorded.

¶25

Accordingty, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶26

Misceltaneous petitions, pending if any, shat[ stand ctosed.

¶27

//TRUE COPY//

¶28

Sd/. P. PADMANABHA^REDDY ASSISTTI^REGISTRAR r -1)

¶29

SECTION^OFFICER

¶30

To,

¶31

'1 . The lll Addl. Judicial First Class^{Magistrate at Hanamkonda'}

¶32

2.TheStationHouseOfficer,KakatiyaUniversity-KUCPoliceStation'Warangal District.

¶33

One CC to^{Srl. M.P Kashyap Advocate [OPUC]'}

¶34

4.TwoCCstoPublicProsecutor,HighCourtfortheStateofTelangana'[OUT]

¶35

Two^{CD CoPies.}

¶36

YIPPR^&

0 t

HIGH COURT

MLJ

DATED:21 10712023

r9 STATE q;
,li
::>
)) lt [\tl$B
*l '/
<1. ,/
(a' i n.(:'i,'.---
r.,l.l.--,./-'

¶43

ORDER

¶44

CRLP.No.6449 0t 2023

¶45

DISMISSING OF CRIMINAL PETITION AS WITHDRAWN

¶46

@coPiel S.n---.{e\ar

Md. Ghouse v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Ghouse v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Estharla Kiran Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Badam Praveen Vs Dr P Raghu

S.Bala Krishna Vs the State of Tg., Rep. by P.P. and Another

Nanavath Thouria and 3 others Vs The State of Telangana and another

Ganta Sheshidar Rao and 2 others Vs The State of Telangana and another

Gutta Ujwal Vs The State of Telangana and Another