Disposed

Thogari karunakar v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC23 Jan 2023CRLP/627/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash an FIR under Sections 498-A, 323 and 506 IPC, the Court observed the dispute pertained to the spouses. It directed the investigating officer to conclude inquiries without coercive steps against the petitioner-accused.

What did the court decide?

The investigation to be conducted without taking any coercive steps against the petitioner-accused.

Thogari karunakar Vs The State of Telangana — Dowry and Cruelty | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

MONDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION No: 627 OF 2023

¶6

Between:

¶7

Thogari karunakar, S/o- Hanumanthu, Aged about 38 years, R/o. H.No.6-2-3, Subhash Nagar, Vemulawada, Rajanna, Sircilla District. 505302.

¶8

...PETITIONERYACCUSED

¶9

AND

¶10

'1 . The State of Telangana, through S.H-O. Vemulawada Police Station, rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.

¶11

Smt. Thogari Latha, Wo. karunakar, Age 30 years, Caste. Munnuru Kapu, Occ. House wife, Rl/o. Subhash Nagar, Vemulawada Village and Mandal, Rajanna Sircilla District.

¶12

...RESPONDENTS/ DEFACTO COMPLAINANT

¶13

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the FIR registered against the Petitioner/Accused vide Crime No. 482 of 2022, dt. 29.12.2022 by the S.H.O. Vemulawada (T) Police Station, Rajanna Sircilla District for the offence U/s . 498-A, 323 and 506 of t.P.c.,

¶14

l.A. NO: 2OF 2023

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the l/emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including arrest of the Petitioner/Accused vide Crime No. 482 ot 2022, dt. 29.12.2022 by the S.H.O. Vemulawada (T) Police Station, Rajanna Sircilla District pending disposal of the Quash Proceedings

¶16

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri G SATISH BABU ,Advocate for the Petitioner and the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None Appeared for the Respondent No.2

¶17

The Court made the following: ORDER

I t

THE H )NOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUF ENDER CFII,IINAL PETITION No.62 2rl?3

¶22

ORDE R:

¶23

This Cri ninal^petition is filed under Section 4t2 of the Code of Criminal Pr,rcedure, 1973 (for short^.Cr.p.C.,) by :he petitioner_ Accused to qLash the proceedings against him in t:IR No.4g2 of 2022 pending on the file of Station House Officer, Venrulawada Town Police Station, Rajanna Sircilla District, regis.ered for the offences punislrable under Sections 49g-A, 323 and i06 of Indian Penal Code (for short "IpC').

¶24

Heard lelrned counsel for the petitioner _ \ccused and learned Additio ral Public prosecutor for the responcent _ State. Perused the ma erial on record.

¶25

The 2nd nspondent - de factocomplainant aggreved by the conduct of her husband who is the petitioner herein filed the present complair t.

¶26

As seen from the complaint, there are all,tgations of threatening and rssaulting the 2nd respondent. Howevr:r, thr-. basis ..

¶27

¶28

for complaint is the^{alleged illicitrelationof petitionerwith another} woman.

¶29

Keeping in view that^{the disputes are amongstthe spouses,} this Court deems it appropriate^{to directthe Investigating Officerin} respect of FIR No.482 of^{2022pending on the file of StationHouse} Officer, Vemulawada^{TownPoliceStation,Rajanna SircillaDistrict,} to conclude investigation^{without takinganycoercivesteps against} the^petitioner - Accused.^{Further, the petitioner} -^{Accused shall} co-operate with the Investigating^{Officer as and when required for} the purpose of investigation.

¶30

6 Accordingly, the Criminal^{Petitionis dlsposedof.}

¶31

Miscellaneous applications^{pending, if any, shall stand closed'}

¶32

ASSrsrTftiRJAISfffE //rRUE copy// V/

¶33

SECTION OFFICER

¶34

To, 1 . The Judicial First Class Magistrate^{at Vemulawada.}

¶35

The Station House Officer, Vemulawada^{Town Police Station, Rajanna Sircilla} District.

¶36

Two CCs to the Public^{Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at} Hyderabad.(OUT)

¶37

Ohe CC to SRl. G. SATISH BABU,^Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies kam

BsR.

HIGH COURT

DATED:23'01i2023

ORDER

CRLP.No.( 27 of 2023

J=,
.aa 1 TA
i6.
o.
I
(i, 0! rEB 2023
t-l
i..'

¶45

DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION

¶46

ob
t
66 o?
gss

Thogari karunakar v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Thogari karunakar v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt.Akilesh Shalini Reddy Vs Sri.Reddyvari Raja Sekhar

Kummara Ravindra Kummar , Ravindra Kummara Vs The State of Telangana

Nikhl Anukonda , Anumukonda Venkata Nikhil Vs The State of Telangana

Kesineni Srinivas Vs The State of Telangana

Smt.Araganti Santhoshi Vs The State of Telangana and another

Shaik Rahamat Basha Vs State of Telangana