High Court disposed of a Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of a private complaint. The court directed the lower court to conduct and conclude the pending trial within six months instead of quashing the proceedings.
Petition dismissed; trial directed to be completed within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32e9 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5724 OF 2015
Between:
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 AND 3
AND
...RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the Ivlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased toquash the private Complaint in respect of A-2 and A3las already deleted in charge sheet after due enquire and investigation along with CC.No.36'l/2014 in theproceedings thereon registered by the WPS., women, Southzone on the file of XV MM, Nampally,Criminal Court, Hyderabad
l.A. NO: 2 OF 201s(CF LPMP. NO: 5707 oF 201 5)
Petition under t;ection 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumslances stated in the Memorandum of Crounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedingr including investigation arrest of the Detrtiorrers irr C.C.No.361 of 2014 on the file of X'/ M.M. Nampally Hyderabad pendingl dispcsail o1 the above Crl. Petition
This Petition co ning on for hearing,upon perusing the Memo'arrdur of Grounds of Criminal Petition and Ipon hearing the arguments of Sri B Etalamukunde Rao ,Advocate for the Petitioner anc the Assistant Public Prosecutor Vizarath ali on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None Appeared for the Respondent N,t. 2anrl 3
The Court made the following: ORDER
I 1
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL PETITION No.5724 of 2015
ORDER:
This criminal petition is Iiled under Section 482 ol Cr.P.C to quash the private complaint in respect of 42 and 43 whose names nere already deleted in charge sheet after due enquiry and investigation in C.C.No.36 1 of 2Ol4 on the file of XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hvderabad. $ 2. The case ol the petitioners is that they are put to unnecessaly harassment with regard to the said case. Petitioner No. 1 is a senior cttizen and petitioner No.2 is a Government teacher and the trial in the said Calendar Case is camsing hindrance in discharging her duties.
EVV,J :RLP 57 2-4 2015
2
Court in Prrnkaj Kumar vs State of Maha:rashtra and others in crirninal appeal No. LO67 o1' :lO()8 :rnd therefore seeks to quash the C.C.No.361 of 201.1 on the tlle of XV Additionai(:hief Metropolitan Magistrate H-ydrlabacl.
I
EVV,J cRLP_5724_2015
l
expeditiously as possiblc, preferably within six (6) months from the date of receipt ol a copy of this order.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/. N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSTST4NT REGTSTRAR Qt2 SECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
To,
KPK
ADK
Pme.
HIGH COURT
DATED:141O7'2023
ORDER
1tl e srAIA. o
(
I
?)
( )) trl flfl 2m (:
,' .,
.<br>i'---i-.:-:-:;
CRLP.No.5724 of 2015
CR|MINAL PE TITTON tS D|SPpSED
r^q, g\ro)-1'
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial in the pending private complaint should be conducted expeditiously instead of quashing it to avoid harassment.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Rani Bahi
Smt. Rajani
State of Telangana
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
