Dismissed

Miss. Badarla Dheeralesa and 3 Others v. the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and Another

Telangana HC25 Sept 2023CRLP/5582/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana dismissed Criminal Petition No. 5582 of 2017 as infructuous. The petitioners, accused in a criminal case, argued that the underlying cause no longer survived for adjudication, leading to the petition's rejection.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition No. 5582 of 2017 dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petitions closed.

Miss. Badarla Dheeralesa and 3 Others Vs the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and Another — Telangana HC (2023) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[^32sl ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEIilBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

:PRESENT:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5582 oF 2017

¶7

Between

¶8

Miss. Badarla Dheeralesa, D/o Chandrasekhar prasad, Door No. 2_1_gg, Laxma Reddy Colony, Near Junction Main Road, Uppal, Hyderabad.

¶9

Sri Badarla Chandrasekhara^prasad, S/o Dasaradha Ramaiah, Occ Superintendent, Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise and S.Tax, Hyderabad- ll Commissionarate, L.B. Stadium Road, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.

¶10

Smt. Badarla Srivani, Wo Chandrasekhar^prasad, Occ Employee in LlC, Rl/o Door No. 2-1-98, Laxma Reddy Colony, Near Junction Main Road, Uppal, Hyderabad

¶11

Smt. Badarla Bharathi Lakshmi, W/o Thota Venkata Nageswara Rao, Occ Teacher, R/o Plot No. 1 '13, Ramapuram Colony, poianki, penumaluru Mandal, Krishna District.

¶12

...Petationer/Accused

¶13

AND

¶14

The state of lelangana. Rep. By its Public prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad Through the Station House Officer, Uppal police Station, Ranga Reddy District

¶15

Smt. Badarla Salomi, Wo Late B. Hare Rama Koteswara prasad, R/o Door No.67l2ohl2A, Lal Bahadur Nagar, Kakinada, East Godavari District.

¶16

...RespondenUComplainants

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in Crime No. 47012017 on the file of Uppal Policg Station, Ranga Reddy District (Rachakonda) dated 26-05-2017 .

¶18

l.A NO:1 OF 2017{CRLPMP. No 5624 0F 20171

¶19

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including arrest in Crime No. 47Ot2017

¶20

on the file of Uppal Police Station, Ranga Reddy District (Rachakonda) dated 26-05-2017, pending disposal of the quash potition.

¶21

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2017(CRLPMP. NO: 7s80 0F 2017)

¶22

Between:

¶23

Smt. Badarla Salomi, W/o Late B. Hare Ranra Koteswara prasad, R/o Door No. 671201112A, Lal Bahadur Nagar, Kakinada, East Godavari District.

¶24

Vacate Petitioneri 2nd Respondent

¶25

AND

¶26

lt4iss. Badarla Dheeralesa, D/o Chandrasekhar Prasad, Door No. 2-.1-99, Laxma Reddy Colony, Near Junction Main Road, Uppal, Hyderabad.

¶27

Sri Badarla Chandrasekhara Prasad S/o Dasaradha Ramaiah, Occ Superinlendent, Commissioner of Cu:itoms, Central Excise and S.Tax, Hyderabad- ll Commissionarate, L.U. Stadium Road, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.

¶28

Smt. Badarla Srivani, Wo Chandrasekher Prasad, Occ Employee in LlC, R/o Door No. 2-1-98, Laxma Reddy Colony, Near Junction Main Road, Uppal, Hyderabad

¶29

Smt. Badarla Bharathi Lakshmi, W/o Thota Venkata Nageswara Rao, Occ Teacher, R/o Plot No. 1 13, Ramapuram Colony, poranki, penumaluru tu4andal, Krishna District.

¶30

...Petitioners in Crl.P.No.5582 ot 2O17

¶31

5 The State of Telangana Rep. By its Public prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad Through the Station House Crfficer, Uppal police Station, Ranga Reddy Diskict.

¶32

...Respondents/Respondents

¶33

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the crrcumslances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim stay granted in Crl.Mp.No.5624 of 2O1l in Criminal Petition No. 5582 ot 2017 dated 14.7.2017 and ttismiss the above criminal petition.

¶34

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petltion and upon hearing the arguments of Sri CHALLA AJAY KUMAR, Advocate for the Petitioner, PL blic prosecutor, on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and Sri G RONALD RAJU, Adlocate for the Respondent No.2

¶35

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶36

THE HONOURABLE SRI^{JUSTICE K.SURENDER}

¶37

CRIMINAL PETITION NO .5582 0F²⁰¹⁷

¶38

ORDER:

¶39

l. Learned counsel for^{the petitioners/ accused Nos'1} to 4 submits that the^{cause in the criminalpetitionno} longer survives for^{adjudicationand hasttecome} infructuous.

¶40

Recording the said^{submission,this CriminalPetition}

¶41

is dismissed as infructuous.

¶42

Miscellaneous^{petitions,if any, pending, shall stand}

¶43

closed.

¶44

SD/.C.PRAVEEN^KUMAR ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION^OFFICER

To,

1 . The lll Metropolitan^{Magistrate Cyberabad at L BNagar}

¶49

Z. Tne Station^{House Officir,Uppal Police Station'RachakondaDistrict}

¶50

One CC to^{Sri CHALLA AJAY KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC]}

¶51

One CC to^{Sri G RONALD RAJU, Advocate [OPUC]}

¶52

Two CD^CoPies

P$q.

HIGH COURT

DATED:2510912023

ORDER

CRLP.No.5582 of 2017

16E STAIq
(
t.) z ij
')
t1[[i ?d
,/
:.- ai

¶60

CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISMISiSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

¶61

@q*t^' 16\ro\rg

Miss. Badarla Dheeralesa and 3 Others v. the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Miss. Badarla Dheeralesa and 3 Others v. the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The State of Telangana Vs Madavi Sheaku

Jatoth Dayakar Vs State of Telangana

Vattipulusu Surya Chandra Rao, Vs The State of Telangana

Talasila Vijaya Mohan Vs The State of Telangana.,rep.,Pp

Siripuram Pavan Vs State of Telangana and another

Smt. Kota Vijay Kumari Vs The State of Telangana