Dismissed

Akela Uday shankar v. The State of telangana and another

Telangana HC6 Nov 2023CRLP/5440/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed the criminal petition filed under Section 492 Cr.P.C. as infructuous because the petitioner had been acquitted in the underlying compound complaints, rendering the cause of action without survival for adjudication.

What did the court decide?

The criminal petition is dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous applications pending, if any, stand closed.

Akela Uday shankar Vs The State of… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO:5440 oF 2018

¶6

Between:

¶7

Akela Udav Shankar Flat No.305, White House, Road No.13, Banjara Hiils, Hyderabad.'

¶8

...PET|TtoNER/ACCUSED(S)

¶9

AND

¶10

1 The State of Telanoana rep. by the public prosecutor, High Court of Judicature ar Hvderaiad for lhe-dtai;-oi i;i;.d;;;rd the state of Ap., Hyderabad.

¶11

2 M/s.Sree Gokutam Chit and F!nir1^ce- _Co , private Ltd., office at 66, Arcot Road, Kodambakkam, Chennai.600 024^{'r"pi"iinteii'i,V} its^-C-p.n. 'HoijJi N.Venkaresh, S/o Sattaiah, Aged aboui 30 y;5o,-o;;:doi6aion nsiiitini.-"'

¶12

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS

¶13

Petition under Sectron 492 0f cr.p .c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition, the High court may be pleased to alow the criminar petition by quashing the cc.No. g5 or 2017 (old cc.No.378 ot 2017) on the fire of the I Addr. chief Metroporitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad.

¶14

l.A. NO: 1 oF 2018

¶15

Petition under Section 492 of cr.p .c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petitron, the High court may be preased to stay afl further proceedings in cc.No. g5 0f 2017 (ord cc.No.37g of 2017) on the frre of the I Addr chref Metroporitan Magistrate, . Nampafly, Hyderabad, pending disposal of this criminal petition.

¶16

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri r. s Praveen Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner and the pubric prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2.

¶17

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶18

TIIE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶19

CRIMINAL PETITION No.5z14O oF 2018

¶20

ORDE R:

¶21

l.earned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner/accused was acquitted in the cc, as such, the cause in the criminal petition does not survive for adjudicalion and the same has become infructuous.

¶22

2 Recording the aforesaid submission, the criminal petition is dismissed as infructuous

¶23

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶24

//TRUE COPY//

¶25

SD/. L. SIVA PARVATHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶26

¶27

SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The ll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad 2. One CC to Sri T.S. praveen kr-ar, noioca'i" ioiluEl pl.o'e",toi ij,g'i.,'c"|.j.t i"i #Jbtate of retansana, '^{Iffi"?r";l",thePublic}

¶28

Trivo CD Coiies^'

q t

HIGH COURT

DATED: 0611112023

E ST4r€
rvr
o
(
v
1 7 rtB 202[ o
ooJ
*{6-5,

O€s par c.$gO

¶34

ORDER

¶35

CRLP.No.5440 ot 2018

¶36

DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS

¶37

@ r-sr,.
Bru
I 4ror1

Akela Uday shankar v. The State of telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akela Uday shankar v. The State of telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Syed Subani, Vs The State of Telangana

Mallarapu Sravan Kumar Goud Vs The State of Telangana

Diwas Sagar Vs The State of Telangana

Thirumanashetti Subba Rao, Karimnagar Dist. Vs the State of Ts., Rep. by P.P. and Another

M Swapna Vs The State of Telangana and Another

Environmental Engineer Vs The State of Telangana