High Court dismissed a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing/ suspension of lower courts' orders enhancing maintenance, finding no infirmity as the husband had neglected his wife and children.
The Criminal Petition to quash/ suspend maintenance orders is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
:PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL PETITION NO:4659 OF 2017
Between:
R,Laxmanna, S/o. R.Peddaiah, Aged about 44 years, Occ: Teacher U.P School, R/o. Shanthinagar Village, Waddepally Mandal, Gadwal, Mahaboobnaga, DlllriE"tition",.
AND
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C,praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the both the Courts below orders in favour of the Respondents in Criminal Revision Petition No.2/2016 Dated - 09/09/2016 on the file of lllAddl. District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court) Gadwal, in Crl.M.P.No.82512011in [4.C.No. 4/2006 on the file of Addl. Judicial Magistrate, First Class, at Gadwal.
lA NO: 1 OF 2017
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to suspend the orders of both the Courts below favour of the Respondents inCriminal Revision Petition No.2/2016 Dated: 09/09/2016 on the file ofthe Courtof the lll Addl. District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court) Gadwal, in Crl.M.P.No.82512011 in M.C.No. 412006 on the file of Addl. Judicial Magistrate, First Class, atGadwal.
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Shafath Ahmed Khan Advocate for the Petitione(s), and of Sri V Raghunath Advocate for the Respondent No.1 and Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.4.
The Court made the following: ORDER
.!
,/
1
1
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4659 0F 2017
ORDER:
This Criminal petition is filed under Section 4g2 of the Code the of Criminal procedure (for short ,Cr.p.C. ) by petitioner/Accused to quash the both the courts berow orders in Criminal Revision petition No.02 of 2016 dated. 09.09.2016 on the {ile of learned.lll Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track court) Gadwar ancr in crl.M.p.No.g25 of 2orl in M.c.No.04 of 2O06 on the file of [earned Additional Judiciat Magistrate of First Class at Cadwal.
(
2
enhancingmarntenance \ras questioned beforethe Sessions Judge.The learned SessionsJudge refused to interfere r'l'iththe order ofthe learned Magistrate As seenfrom the orders of the Courtsbelorvreasons ai:e glven
5 Accordingly,the Criminal Petition is dismissed
Miscellaneousapplications pending,ifany' sha'll stand
closed.
SD/.T.JAYASREE ASSISTANTREGISTRAR //TRUECOPY// CT
SECTIONOFFICER
To,
1'ThelllAddl.DistrictandSessionsJudge,(Fast.TrackCourt),Gadwal. i. in" noaiLraicialMagistrate of First Class'at Gadwal'^
;. d; iCi;sCt. sHAFATHAHMEDKHANAdvocate [oPUC]
;. o;; aato SRIV RAGHUNATHAdvocate [oPUC]
YIR-\Ar--
HIGH COURT
DATED:01 10912023
ORDER
CRLP.No.4659 of 2017
-Z-:=-:=-
ilta Ii T:\l .S a-:L.
,,/<
t?
if 0 7 il[\l 20?3
:)t :t,,.'.
D!SMISSING OF CRL.P.
"cu'
\25
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the orders enhancing maintenance against the husband.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R.Laxmanna
Smt. Prasanthi
Master Ranji Kumar
Kumari Joy Mercy
The State of Telangana
Justice K.Surender
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
