High Court dismissed a Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of criminal proceedings. Deputy Public Prosecutor submitted the case was referred for lack of evidence, rendering the petition infructuous.
Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. dismissed; proceedings to be quashed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
\.--/'
[320e ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OFTELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OFFEtsRUARY TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKURSUMALATHA
CRIMINAL PETITIONNO: 256 OF 2019
Between:
Shaik lmrarr Sayeed, S/o. Shaik Sultan Sayeed(wrongly mentioned as Shaik Sattar Sayeed),-Aged about 35years, FUo H.No.10-6-230 Hashim Compund, 1st Lancer, Hyderabad.
..PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
... RESPON DE NT/COM P LAI NANTS
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying that in thecircumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of CriminalPetition,the High Court may bepleased to call for the records relating to Cr.No. 573 of2018 of Panjagutta Police Station, Hyderabad District, and toquash theproceedings thereon, andto grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon,ble Court deems fit andproper in the circumstances of the case
l.A NO: 2 OF 2019
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of CriminalPetitiort, theHigh Court may be pleased to grant stay of all furtherproceedings includingthe arrest of the petitioner in Cr.No. 573 of 2018 of Panjagutta Police Station, Hyderabad District pending disposal of the Criminal Petition.
.i.
This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition andupon hearing the argumentsof Sri SHAIK JlLANl, Advocate for thePetitioner and of the Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Telangana onbehalf of the RespondentNo.1 and of Sri-Advocate for the Respondent No.NONEAPPEARED
The Courl made the following:ORDER
//
? i",
HON'BLE DT. TTUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.256 of 2019
ORDER:
Prosecutor, on written instructions, submits that the case has been referred as l,ack of evidence' and thus, the Criminal Petition has become infructuous.
,/
SD/. P.PADMANABHAREDDY ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
\
/ffRUECOPY/ OFFICER
TJt
f /
1
HIGH COURT
DATED i2010212023
ORDER
CRLP.No.256 of 2019
.-i;: ll''i,ti
2 t t'lll 2[n
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL c"dq C9
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be dismissed or allowed upon submission of lack of evidence by the prosecution.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Shaik Imrarr Sayeed
The State of Telangana
Dr. Justice Chillakur Sumalatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
