The Telangana High Court dismissed Criminal Petition No. 2548 of 2015 as infructuous following the verified settlement and subsequent acquittal of the petitioner in the underlying case before the Lok Adalat.
The criminal petition was dismissed as infructuous pending miscellaneous applications were closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
i I I I I ; I I I i i i
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE G.ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
CRIMINAL PETI TION NO: 2548 0F 2015
Between:
A..Karunakar Reddy, S/o. Sathi. Reddy, Age:41 years, Occ. Business, RJo H.No.3-1 1 -468, Shiva Gansa Colony, t\i;$;ru;r6:i.d r.,r"gur., Hyderabad
...PETITIONERYACCUSED
AND
...RESPONDENT/DE-FACTO COM PLAINANT
Petition under Section 492 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Fetition, the High C;r; ;;y be pleased to quash the charge sheet in c.c.No.363 of 2014 on the file of the Hon'ble lX- Special Magistrate it Hasthinapur, Ranga Reddy District.
CRLPMP. NO: 275s oF 201s
Petition under section 4g2 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the lvlemorandum of Grounds of criminar petition, the High court may be pleased stay of all further proceedings including ,pp"rrin." oi in" petitio ne r/accu sed in c.c No. 363 of 2014 oi the fire of the Fion'bre rX speciar lvlagistrate at Hasthinapur, Ranga Reddy District.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the lr,4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri K VENUIT/ADHAV, Advocate for the petitioner and the pubric prosecutor (TG/AP) on behalf of the Respondent No. and of tr,4/S TNDUS LAW FlRtV, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2
The Court made the following: ORDER
I I
THE HON'B,,E SMT. JUSTICE G. ANUPAMA CHAKR,IV'ARTITY
CIIIMINAL PETITION No.2548 of 2015
ORDER
As per t re proceedings datecl 06.02.2O23. it is ;-,. pO:.ted by the learned A ssistant Public Prosecutor that. t})e rn.rtt,rr was setlled bL'fore .he l,ok Adalat.'lherefore, thrs C rurl ( .I ect,rd lhe Iearnr:d couns:l for the petitioncr to verify u,he ther t he matter was settled or nol.
'2. 'lorlay t ris Court rcceived thc copy of lhe i)lter dated 07.O2.2O2i\ a Ilressed bv the Spccial Mobile Crrrrrt r:um IV Additronal .lu rior Civil Judge-cum IV Additic,nal l4ctro )olitan Magistrat-e, Re nga Reddy District irt L.B.Nagar. t() t tc Principal District & Ses sions Judge, Rang:,r Rcdd-t Distlict a, ,.B.Nagar, wl'rich disclos( s that the case u'as scttlccl before rLLr l.ok Adatat and acclLsed 'vas acquitted under Scctir;n 32()(8) of ,ir.l).C for the oflence punishable under Section 5()4 o LP.C on 03.09.2O15 ar d the case bundlc uas constgn,,d to 1l e (lentral Rccord Sectior on 23.10.2018.
I
Pending miscellaneousapplications,if any, shall stand
closed.
Sd/-N CHAND RA SEKHARRAO ASSISTANTREGIST
//TRUECOPY//
SECTIONOFFICER
To,
;: lV:i"n!1 l["r?ib""
Njb
kam xf.'}
HIGH COURT
DATED:08102'2023
<br>'<br>,:
l I L 2 I, tii, ?.$1 ,.i
ORDER
CRLP.No.254) of 2015
DISMISSIN(i ]'H h CRIMIN;\1. PF. I ITION AS INITIi.IJCfUOUS
.v).1_
f
A.Karunakar Reddy
The State of Telangana
Karnuri Kapir Prasad
G. Anupama Chakravarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
