Dismissed
R.Rajeshwar Reddy and Another v. State of Ap.
Telangana HCCRLP/1713/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
132541
IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE G.ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1713 OF 2014
Between
AND
STATE OF AP., Rep by its lnsepctorof PoliceCID HyderabadRep by Public Prosecutor
...RESPONDENT/COM PLAINANT
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying thatin the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of CriminalPetition, the High Court may be pleased to set-aside the orders made in RP.No.2 ot 2014 dl 5.2-2014 on thefile of the MSJ, Hyderabad and theorders made in Crl.MP.No.5810of 2009in CC No.390 of 2006 on the file of theVl Addl.M.M., Hyderabaddt02.12.2013
CRLPMP. NO: 1465 OF 2014
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Groundsof criminal Petition, the High court maybe pleased to stay of all further proceedings including the appearanceof the petitioner in CC No.390/2006 of Vl Addl.M.M.,Nampally, Hyderabad pending disposal of the main Crl.P.
This Petition coming on forhearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition andupon hearing the argumentsof Sri E V S S ACHARYULU ,Advocatefor the Petitionerand of the Additional Public Prosecutorof the Sole Respondent.
The Court made the following:ORDER
I I
\
THE HON,E LI, SMT. JUSTICE G. ANUPAMA CHA]KRIIVARTHY
CR|.MINAL PETITION No,1713 of 2oltl
ORDER
Thrs r:ri rnin,,rl pe tition is filed to quash thc prr.,cec:dings in Cr1.R.P I'{cr.2 rf 2014, dated O-5.O2.2O14 on the fi.t ol learned Metropolrlar lc ssions Judgc, Ilyderabad and the .,rders made in CTL.M P No 5,i10 of 2OO9 rn C.C.No.390 of 2006 c,n the lile of VI Acldrtional C hief Metropoli[an Magistrate at [-lvrlerrtbad for the offcrrces rtLnishable under Sections 40,1, 409t. 465, 47 7, 477-A and 4l O ol I.P.C and Section 87 (ll(2) oi A.I: Erlucation Act, 1982
e'
Public Prosecutor would submitthat, the CalendarCaseNo. 39O of 2O06 is coming upfor furthe revidence as already charges have been framed.Therefore, nothing survives for adjudication in thiscriminal petitionas the petitionitself is Illed against the ordersof discharge. Therefore, the petition is accordingly dismissedas infructuous.
Pending miscellaneousapplications, if any, shall stand
closed
SD/-MOHD SANAULLAH ANSARI ASSISTAUIREGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// (aO
SECTION OFFICER
To,
SB 896.
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 510212023
ORDER
-a':i1.: S;lr' f€ c
'i
I i s liil 2023
:
<br>,./
CRLP.No.1713 ot 2014
DISMISSING TI{E CRLP AS INFRUCTUOI"'S WITHOUT COSTS
Esll
)rl.:'
R.Rajeswar Reddy
G.Deen Dayal Reddy
State of A.P.
G.Anupama Chakravarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court