The High Court of Telangana dismissed Criminal Petition No. 15952 of 2014 for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear when listed for dismissal on multiple dates, despite counsel appearing for respondents.
Criminal Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTHDAY OF AUGUST TWO IHOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICEE.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETI TIONNO| 15952 0F 2014
Between:
SIRASALA NAGAIAH,NALGONDADT',, S/o.Gurvaiah, Occ Agriculture, Rl/o' Damaracherla Village and Mandal,Nalgonda District.
...Petitioner/Accused
AND
...2nd RespondenUstate
Petition under Section482 olCr.P-C praying that in the circumstances stated in the lrlemorandumof Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to call for recordsrelating to the order dated 26.09.2014 passedin crl.mP.No.406 of2014 in CC.No.245 of 2013 ont he file of the Honble special Magistrate, MiryalagudaNalgondaDistrict and quashthe sameconsequently allow the Crl.MP.No.406of 2014.
l.A. NO: 1OF 20 14(CRLPMP.NO:17094 OF 2014)
Petition under section 482 of cr.P.cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandumof Groundsof criminal Petition, the High courtmay be pleased togrant interim stayof all further proceedings call for records relating to the order dated 26.09.2014passedin crl.mP.No.406of 2014 in cc.No.245of
2013 ont he file of the Hon'ble Special Magistrate,Miryalaguda Nalgonda District and quash the same consequenily allow theCrl.MP.No.406of 2O14-
This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusingthe Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and uponhearingthe arguments of Sri G L NAGESWAR RAO, Advocatefor thePetitioner and the Public Prosecutor (TG)on behalf of the RespondentNo.2 andof Sri lVaheswaraRaoKuncham, Advocate for the Respondent No.1.
The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLESRT JUSTICEE.V.VENUGOPAL
CRIMINALPE TITIONNo.15952 of 2OL4
ORDER:
None appearsfor the petitioner'Even on the previous dates ofhearingi.e., on 22.06.2023,30'06'2023' 2l'O7'2023' 2a.O7.2023and O4.O8.2023,therewas no representation for the petitioner.Today, though the matter was listed under the caption 'ForDismissal',none appearedfor the petitioner'
4 Accordingly,this criminal petitionis dismissed for non- prosecution.
Pendingmiscellaneous applications,if any, shallstand
closed.
Sd/. P.NAGABHUSHANAMBA ASSISTANT(REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// n,.' SECfldI( OFFICER
To,
5 SM
-T: .E##ry--:a-=
G_
g / I
HIGH COURT
EW, J
DATED: 1110812023
/a .r | r ':.
I j , --
v
ORDER
CRLP.No.15952 of 2O14
CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISMISSED FOR NON. PROSECUTION
#F
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant relief in a criminal petition for quashing of proceedings.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SIRASALA NAGAIAH
IV/S. SHRIRAIVI CITY UNION FIN LTD.
The State of Telangana
E.V. VENUGOPAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
