Disposed

Mutyalarao Siddabathuni and 3 others v. The State of Telangana and another

Telangana HC3 Apr 2023CRLP/1539/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a criminal petition seeking quashing of proceedings and stay of arrests. The court directed police not to take coercive steps, issued notice under Section 41A Cr.P.C., and required the accused to execute a bond for Rs. 50,000 to assist the investigation into forgery and cheating allegations.

What did the court decide?

Directed police not to take coercive steps, issued notice under Section 41A Cr.P.C., and ordered the petitioners to execute a bond of Rs. 50,000.

Mutyalarao Siddabathuni and 3 others Vs The State of… — Cheque Dishonour | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³²⁵¹ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

MONDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶6

CR]MINAL PETITION NO: 1539 OF 2023

¶7

Between:

¶8

Mutyalarao Siddabathuni, S/o late. Venkata Murali Manohar Rao, Aged about 73 years, Occ- Business, Rl/o.H.No.16-5-29011 , Balajinagar, Kothapet Post and Mandal, Guntur District. Andhra Pradesh

¶9

N. Ashok, Sio.Janganna, Aged about 41 years, Occ- Business, Rt/o.H.No.3111lC, Chinna Melpally, Jagityal District.

¶10

Nagulapalli Mahipal Reddy, S/o.N.Ashanna, aged about 39 years, OccBusiness, Fl/o.H.No.2-'102,. Kourtla Village, Chinnametpalli Mandal, Karimnagar District.

¶11

Aleti Rajendhar, Sio.A,Rajesham, age about 34 years, Occ-Business, Flio.H.No.3-1^'1 1, Chinna Metpalli, Kortutla Mandal, Karirirnagar District

¶12

...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED No.1 to 4

¶13

AND

¶14

The State of Telangana, Rep by its Publib Prosecutor High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad

¶15

...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶16

2 Cenkata Shiva Ramakrishna Rao Miryala, S/o.Narayana Rao, aged about 63 years, O9c- Builder, R/o. H. No. 1 1 /794-28, Rabardsonpet, Machilipatnam, Krishna District, A.P.

¶17

...RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAI NANT

¶18

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,.the High Court may be pleased to call for the entire recoids in F.l.R.No.279 of 2022 dated 2911012O22 on the file of S.H.O., CCC Naspur P.S. Ramagundam, (Peddapalli) District.

¶19

l.A. NO: 1OF 2023

¶20

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including arrest of the petitioners in connection with F.l.R.No.279 of 2022 dated 2911012022 on the file of S.H.O., CCC Naspur P.S, Ramagundam, (Peddapalli) District.

¶21

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/s. Ahmed Law Firm, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Additional Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri L. Ravinder, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.

¶22

The Court made the following: ORDER

, I

t t

THE HONOURABLE SRI ]USTICE K.SURENDER

¶27

CRIMINAL PETITION No. 1539 OF 2023

¶28

ORDER:

¶29

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, t973^(for short'Cr.P.C.) by the^petitioners - Accused No.l to 4 to^quash the^proceedings against them in FIR No.279 of 2022^pending on the file of Station House Officer, CCC Naspur Police Station, Ramadundam (Peddapalli) District, filed for the offences^punishable under Sections 465, 468, 471, 420 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code (for short "IPC').

¶30

Heard learned counsel for the^petitioners - Accused No.1 to 4 and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent - State. Perused the material on record.

¶31

The learned counsel for the^petitioners would submit that the complaint was filed to seftle the civil disputes, however, there are allegations of fabrication of documents and the^petitioners are ready to assist the investigation. Accordingly, the police are directed to not to take any coercive steps against the petitioners and issue notice under Section 41A of Cr.P.C. and conclude the

¶32

¶33

investigation. The petitioners shall co-operate with the

¶34

Investigating Officer in concluding the investigation and execute a bond of Rs.50,000/- to the satisfaction of Station House Offlcer,

¶35

CCC Naspur Police Station, Ramadundam (Peddapalli) District.

¶36

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶37

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶38

Sd/-A.V.S.PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /, //TRUE COPY// c"

¶39

SECTION OFFIGER

¶40

To,

¶41

'1 . The Station House Officer, CCC Naspur Police Station, Ramagundam, Ramagundam District.

¶42

One CC to M/s. Ahmed^{Law Firm,Advocate} [OPUC]

¶43

One CC to Sri L. Ravinder,^Advocate [OPUC]

¶44

Two CCs to the Public^{Prosecutor,HighCourt for the State of Telangana at} Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶45

Two CD Copies gbr

HIGH COURT

DATED: 0310412023

O;.
:$
tt [?sNB
:!)

ORDER

CRLP.No.1539 of 2023

DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION

Mutyalarao Siddabathuni and 3 others v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mutyalarao Siddabathuni and 3 others v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramu Sunkenapalli Vs The State of Telangana and another

Mirza Hameedalla Baig Vs The State of Telangana

D.Venkat Reddy and another Vs The State of Telangana and another

Ponugoti Jithender Rao Vs Siripuram Ramaiah

Sukesh Gupta Vs Directorate of Enforcement

Mr. Datta Aditya Vs The State of Telangana and another