Dismissed

M.Janardhan Rao, Hyd. v. the State of Telangana Rep by Pp and Another.

Telangana HC5 Oct 2023CRLP/13850/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge of Telangana High Court dismissed a criminal petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C as infructuous upon recording submissions that the underlying criminal cause no longer survives for adjudication, with the State taking no objection. Petitioning advocate is M.Janardhan Rao.

What did the court decide?

Criminal proceeding no longer survives for adjudication. Criminal petition dismissed as infructuous attached with miscellaneous pending in this Cr.P.

M.Janardhan Rao, Hyd. Vs the State of Telangana… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^32ee ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA , AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

:PRESENT:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 13850 OF 2014

¶7

Between:

¶8

M.Janardhan Rao, S/o.Late M.S.K.l\4urthy, Occ Advocate, R/o.H.No.2-3-35, Flat No.G-5, Sai Residency, Shankernagar, Amberpet, Hyderabad.

¶9

... Petitioner/Accused

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Telangana., Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High court at Hyderabad, Hyderabad.

¶12

Kumari Kimidi Neeraja, D/o.K.Venkata Rama Rao, Occ MCA Student, F/o.H.No.HlG-55, 9th Phase, KPHB Colony, Kukatpally, Hyderabad.

¶13

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS

¶14

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the l\tlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the Criminal Proceedings in CC.No.120/2014 pending on the file of XIX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad at Erramanzil.

¶15

l.A. NOJ OF 20'!4(CRLPMP. NO: 14633 OF 20141

¶16

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased Stay all Further Proceedings including Appearance of the Petitioner/Accused in CC.No.12012014 pending on the file of XIX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad at Erramanzil, pending disposal of the above criminal petition.

¶17

l.A. NO: 1OF 2023

¶18

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P .C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the interim orders Dt.02-1 2-2014 in Crl.P.No.13850/2014, pending disposal of the above Criminal Petition.

¶19

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2014(CRLPMP NO: 17642 OF 20141

¶20

Between:

¶21

Kumari Kimidi Neeraja, D/o.K.Venkata Rama Rao, Occ MCA Student, R/o.H.No.HlG-55, 9th Phase, KPHB Colony, Kukatpalty, Hyderabad.

¶22

... Petitioner/Defacto-Complainant

¶23

AND

¶24

'1 . M.Janardhan Rao, S/o.Late tV.S.K.Murthy, Occ Advocate, Rl/o.H.No.2-3-35, Flat No.G-5, Sai Residency, Shankernagar, Amberpet, Hyderabad.

¶25

.. . RespondenUCom plainant

¶26

The State of Telangana., Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High court at Hyderabad, Hyderabad.

¶27

.. . RespondenUAccused

¶28

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the l\4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated O2.12.2O14 passed in Cr|.MP.No. 1463312014 in Crl.P,No.13850 of 2O14 which is pending on the fite of the above Court.

¶29

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the [/emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri C HARI PREETH, Advocate for the Petitioner, Sri VIZARATH ALl, Assistant public Prosecutor, on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri GOPALAKRISHNA KALANIDHI, Advocate for the Respondent No.2

¶30

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶31

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL

¶32

CRIMINAL PETITION No.1385O of 2Ot4

¶33

ORDER:

¶34

This criminal petition is filed seeking to quash the criminal proceedings in C.C.No. 120 of 2014 pending on the file of the learned XIX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad at Erramanzitr.

¶35

lleald the learned counsel for the petitioner/ accused as well as the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent- State.

¶36

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the car-ise in the crimina-l petition does not survive for adjudication. Therefore, no further orders are required and hence seeks to dismiss the same as infructuous.

¶37

Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appea_ring for the respondent-State present ald takes no objection to the same.

¶38

Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner/ accused as well as the learned Assistant

¶39

¶40

Public Prosecr.rtor appearing for respondent-Sta.te, this Court is

¶41

inclined to dismiss the criminal petition as infruct--uous

¶42

6 . Accordingly, this criminal petition is dismissed as

¶43

infructuous.

¶44

Mis<:e[laleous petitions;, if a.ny, pending in this criminal

¶45

petition, shall also stand closed.

¶46

//TRUE^COPY//

¶47

Sd/. T.^JAYASREE ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR lJe

¶48

SECTION^OFFICER

¶49

To, 1 rheXrXAdditionargf^{j:l_M;["bp.,"4i",f} 2 ":f:"Sli$ili*,"ff^r::ilT;, The station^{Hq'?9.o[!ll^cutor,} High court tor rne

¶50

3 Two CCs^{to Public Prose}

¶51

4 :iJvoca'1eropUC] 5 [':t"itlj'iililAxlll'-t',lkt',xii.,:'sfi

¶52

6 Two CD^CoPies SP

HIGH COURT

DATED:0511012023

ORDER

CRLP.No.13850 o12014

1 t\g STAI5 o
(
v
o
c
l'r N[.'l ?t?3
Jtt
t
t D::seA1 (,$cC
i.,

¶59

CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

¶60

nc{'a +-fl,(,,

M.Janardhan Rao, Hyd. v. the State of Telangana Rep by Pp and Another.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Janardhan Rao, Hyd. v. the State of Telangana Rep by Pp and Another.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nalla Sammaiah , Sommya, Parsigutta, Hyderabad Vs Naveen.B. Mahendra Hills, Hyd., and Anr., Rep. by Pp.

Varikuppala Buchaiah Vs the State of A.P.

B.P.S.Durga Sai Prasad, Yousufguda, Hyd., Vs Smt.B.P.S.v.Kiranmai, Karwan, Hyd.,and 2 Others, Rep Pp.

Vathalur Sreedhara Reddy Vs Mrs.Bharathi Reddy and 2 Others

Dayakar Kishan Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Myadari Rajesham, Karimnagar District Vs Myadari Rajavva, Karimnagar District and Anr, Rep.,by Pp.