Criminal Appeal No. 845 of 2008 was disposed of because the senior counsel for the accused/respondent submitted that the accused died, causing the cause of action not to survive for adjudication. The pending miscellaneous applications were stayed.
Disposal of Criminal Appeal No. 845 of 2008 due to death of the accused.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3251 J
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OFJUNE N/VO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 845 oF 2008
Appeal under Section 378(4) of Criminal Procedurecodeagainstthe Order dated. 16.O5,2007 passed in CC.No.7 4612002 on the fileof the Courtof the Hon'ble Xl Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad.
Between:
Sunder Matta, S/o. Kannayalal Matta, Business,R./o.1 1 -12, Sindhi Colony,First Floor, Secunderabad
...ApellanUComplainant.
AND
... Respodents/Accused.
Counsel for the Appellant: SRl.C M R VELU
Counsel for the Respondent No.1:NAGESHWARARAO PAPPU
Counsol for the Respondent No.2:PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (TG)
The court made the following:JUDGMENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL APPEAL No.845 0F 2008
JUDGMENT:
stand closed.
Sd/C.V.MALLIKARJUNAVARMA JOINT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1 The Xl Additronal ChiefMetropolitan Magistrate,at Secunderabad ( With Records if anY) ) One CC to SRIC M R VELU,Advocate [OPUC]
3 One CC to SRl.NAGESHWARARAO PAPPUAdvocate IOPUCI 4 Two CCs to PUBLICPRoSECUTOR (TG) Advocate [OUT] E Two CD Coptes.
J gk
\
I
I I
HIGH COURT
OA.TEOl07lOGl2O23
JUDGMENT
CRLA.No.845 of 2008
I r. !/'l
t)
,:l s
I il \-
rJ
<br>'.=.:''-'
DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINALAPPEAL
.$0
b
*
Sunder Matta
Vijay Kumar
State of A.P.
K. Surender
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
