Dismissing the civil miscellaneous appeal as infructuous due to the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellants that the subject matter of the appeal has become infructuous.
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 174 of 2018 dismissed as infructuous. Pending miscellaneous applications stayed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32s3 ]
IN THE HIGH COURTFOR THESTATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OFNOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICEM.G.PRIYADARSINI
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEALNO: 174 OF 2018
Appeal Under order XLlll Rulel(r) CPCagainst the order dated 18.12.2017 in 1.A" No. 154 of 2017in (F.C.O.P.)O.S. No. 05 ot 2O17 on the file of the Judge Family Court, City CivilCourt, at Secunderabad
Between:
Both Petitioners 2 and 3 areRl/o. H.No. 12-14-279/1 ,Vinobha Nagar, Lalapet, Secunderabad (As the Petitioner nos. 2 and3are beingminors, The Petitioner no. 1 is representing on their behalf)
...APPELLANT/PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS
AND
.RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Appellants: SRl. T. SURYASATISH
Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: SRl. G. SANJAYKUMAR
The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M.G. PRIYADARSINI
CIVIL MISCELLANEO US APPEAL No. 174 of2018
JUDGMENT:
Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the subject matter of the appeal has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission of the learned counsel, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. No order as to costs.
Sd/- K. SRINIVASARAO JOINT RE ISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION FFICER
To,
'1 . The Judge Family Court, City Civil Court, atSecunderabad 2. one cc"tosRl. i.sunyn sATlsH,Advocate[oPUC] 5. On" CC toSRl. G. SANJAY KUMAR, Advocate[OPUC]
4
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1711112023
JUDGMENT
CMA.No.174 ot 2018
1tr t SrAr e
P
o
0 7 ii3 2[2[
Co
i
-t
,+
,:J 2
,83;:/r (t.i
')./
DISMISSING THE APPEAL
AS INFRUCTUOUS
G)q8
K. Pushpa
Kumari K. Ivleghana
It/aster K. Ram Tarun
K. Shantha Bai @ Shantha
The General Manager, South Central Railway
Justice M.G. Priyadarsini
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
